Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 117 High Quality v Auckland Council [pdf, 885 KB]

   High Quality Limited v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 117 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN HIGH QUALITY LIMITED (ENV-2021-AKL-66) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge J A Smith Commissioner K E Prime Commissioner S Myers Hearing: 11 – 14 April 2022 30 May 2022 (site visit) Last case event: 30...

2. LCRO 239/2020 DP v FJ obo RK (25 June 2021) [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...scope of review [58] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:18 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...

3. LCRO 24/2023 RD v KE and PS (5 September 2023) [pdf, 329 KB]

   ...scope of review [102] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:12 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...

4. Waitangi Tribunal - Part II Te Urewera [pdf, 6.9 MB]

   T    E  U     R  E  W  E  R  A P   A  R  T     I  I,  V    O    L    U    M    E  1 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W  A  I�

5. Skerrett-White - Allotments 302 - 315 town of Richmond and Richmond Township Allotments 18 - 20 (2013) 2013 Chief Judge's MB 473 (2013 CJ 473) [pdf, 393 KB]

   2013 Chief Judge’s MB 473 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIĀRIKI DISTRICT A20050009088 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Allotments 302-315 Town of Richmond and Richmond Township Allotments 18-20 BETWEEN COLLEEN SKERRETT-WHITE and TE ARIKI MOREHU Applicants Hearing: 20 January 2006, 109 Whakatāne MB 1 10 March 2006, 8 Conference MB 56 1 and 2 June 2006, 111 Whakatāne MB 153 16 April 2007, 308 Rotor

6. [2017] NZEnvC 124 Skyline Enterprises Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...Family Trust v Mar/borough District Council [2017] NZHC 52 at [76], applying Environmental Defence Society Inc v The New Zealand King Salmon Co Limited [2014] NZSC 38, [2014] 1 NZLR 593, [2014] NZRMA 195. For completeness, it is noted that the Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal in R J Davidson Family Trust v Mar/borough District Council [2017] NZCA 194 (23 May 2017) and the decision on that appeai is awaited at the date of writing this decision. R J Davidson Family Trust v Mar/borough...

7. MLC 2019 May National Panui [pdf, 356 KB]

   Contents: Applications for hearing in MAY | HARATUA 2019: ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz MAY | HARATUA 2019 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confi rmed at the time of this publication are listed. For more information, plea

8. [2019] NZEnvC 173 Summerset Villages (St Johns) Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 9 MB]

   ...under the Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP). The application was refused by Commissioners appointed by Auckland Council primarily relating to concerns about impact of the scale and height of the development on the amenity of the area. [3] Summerset has appealed the decision and modified its proposal as a result of mediation and preparation for this hearing. A significant number of s274 parties have subsequently withdrawn their notice of appearance and Mrs Ngata remains the single s274 p...

9. [2018] NZEmpC 60 FGH v RST [pdf, 720 KB]

   ...Mr Henderson’s analysis when presenting her submissions, so as to be able to answer the assertions that were raised. [16] However, the Court is obliged to determine the case according to the pleadings. This was emphasised by the Court of Appeal in Price Waterhouse v Fortex Group Ltd, in dicta which is no less important now than it was then:3 It has become fashionable in some quarters to regard the pleadings as being of little importance. There was an echo of that approach in...

10. OIA-113748.pdf [pdf, 7 MB]

    ...referred back to the appeal courts. The CRCC is an independent Crown entity. It is funded by the Crown but is independent of Government or Ministerial control. Any person who considers they have been wrongly convicted or sentenced (and has used their appeals) can apply to the CCRC to have their case reviewed. Backpocket Q&A – Criminal Cases Review Commission Document 3 24 s9(2)(g)(i) RE LE AS ED U ND ER T HE O FF IC IA L IN FO RM AT IO N AC T 19 82...