Search Results

1. Directory of Official Information 2019 A-C [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...Consent Authorities • Physical Sciences • Medical Testing • Metrology and Calibration • Radiology Services. Chairpersons of each PAC are members of the Accreditation Advisory Committee (AAC). The AAC and/or the Council may adjudicate any appeals arising from IANZ accreditations. Records Records are maintained on client registrations, assessments, reports and correspondences. A directory of IANZ accreditations is maintained and made available for public viewing on www.ian...

2. Regulatory Impact Statement a Stronger Response to Family Violence information sharing between court jurisdictions in domestic violence cases [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...sharing in DV cases party’s rights and confidence  in the justice system  know something about  the information without  seeing it first   Allows relevance to be determined  by existing legislation and checked  by appeal/review processes if  necessary   Access to address information  42. The alternative option we propose  for  remedying uncertainty of access  to criminal  jurisdiction  address information is to provide for un...

3. [2011] NZEmpC 175 Maynard v Bay of Plenty DHB [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...to constructive dismissal, she said: “… I 7 [2006] ERNZ 517. 8 At [36]-[37]. 9 Note: Other aspects of the Employment Court’s decision, unrelated to this commentary, were overturned on appeal: Commissioner of Police v Creedy [2007] NZCA 311, [2007] ERNZ 505 (CA); Creedy v Commissioner of Police [2008] NZSC 31, [2008] ERNZ 109, [2008] 3 NZLR 7. feel that you have sided with Faith right from the beginning of this whole inve...

4. [2011] NZEmpC 6 Green v Transpacific Industries Group NZ Ltd [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...injunction for the relatively short balance of the restraint than that the defendant should be required to prove its loss and damages at trial. [37] Ultimately, this Court must take appropriate cognisance of the clear signal given by the Court of Appeal in Fuel Espresso v Hsieh 2 that not only are such provisions to be taken seriously by the parties that have entered into them expressly but that they are amenable to enforcement by injunction to the extent that they are reasonable a...

5. [2009] NZEmpC WC 10/09 Terson Industries Ltd v Loder [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...being what the parties using those words against the relevant background would reasonably have been understood to mean. 7 Mount Joy Farms Ltd v Kiwi South Island Co-operative Dairies Ltd (Court of Appeal, CA297/00, 6 December 2001) at para 38, per Hammond J for the Court 8 Hansells (NZ) Ltd v Ma [2007] ERNZ 637 at para [35] 9 Association of Staff in Tertiary Education Inc v Hampton, Chief Executive of the Bay of Plenty Polytechnic [20...

6. [2008] NZEmpC WC 12A/08 Orakei Group (2007) Ltd formerly PRP Auckland Ltd v Doherty [pdf, 52 KB]

   ...but what is required is more than two unrelated employers. There must be a sufficient degree of a relationship between the legal entities. In judging that relationship the Court will look for the element of common control. [57] The Court of Appeal for Ontario in Downtown Eatery (1993) Ltd v Ontario10 cited with approval the Court at first instance in Sinclair v Dover Engineering Services Ltd11 where the trial judge held that: The old-fashioned notion that no man can serve two ma...

7. [2015] NZEmpC 208 Caffe Coffee (NZ) Ltd v Farrimond interlocutory [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...and director. [23] I turn now to the issue of protections. In the leading decision as to issues of confidentiality arising in the process of discovery and inspection, Port Nelson Limited v Commerce Commission, 7 the full bench of the Court of Appeal confirmed that in some cases sufficient protection of confidential documents can be given by reason of the conditions which apply to discovered documents – which in the case of this Court are described in reg 51 of the Regulations....

8. CAC 10012 v Khan [2011] NZREADT 11 [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...licence and impose the maximum fine of $750. This decision and penalty were given orally by the Tribunal at the conclusion of the hearing. Our reasons for this decision are set out above. [45] The Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to the appeal provisions in s.116 Real Estate Agents Act 2008. DATED at Auckland this 15th day of June 2011 ______________________________ Ms K G Davenport Chairman ____________________________...

9. CAC20009 v Li [2015] NZREADT 48 [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...indicates a lack of candour that may be significant 9 when considering the fitness of a practitioner to remain in the legal profession.” [13] Mr Clancy also made reference to Bolton v the Law Society [1994] 2 ALL ER 486 where the Court of Appeal said: “Any solicitor who is shown to have discharged his professional duties with anything less than complete integrity, probity and trustworthiness must expect severe sanctions to be imposed upon him by the Solicitor’s Discipl...

10. Y v Xue [2015] NZIACDT 6 (13 February 2015) [pdf, 199 KB]

    ...(DC Christchurch, CIV 2013-009-001684, 28 January 2014) are decisions primarily dealing with facts. In the High Court, both parties took the position that they would not support the District Court’s analysis of the facts; the High Court allowed the appeal on that basis. [22] None-the-less the District Court’s observation that when something is truly beyond a person’s control it does not trigger professional disciplinary consequences is an un-contentious and unexceptional professiona...