Search Results

1. Guide for Policy and Legal Advisors

   ...conditions as the prosecution the right, if convicted of an offence in respect of which the penalty has been varied between the commission of the offence and sentencing, to the benefit of the lesser penalty the right, if convicted of the offence, to appeal according to law to a higher court against the conviction or against the sentence or against both the right, in the case of a child, to be dealt with in a manner that takes account of the child's age. These rights only affect what should hap...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Constitutional issues & human rights >
   3. The Bill of Rights Act

2. Eichelbaum report - appendices [pdf, 540 KB]

   ...evidence at trial against Michaels, alleging a range of bizarre sexual practices which had allegedly occurred during school hours. Despite the absence of any supporting medical evidence, Michaels was found guilty. However, the verdict was quashed on appeal, largely on the basis of the highly suggestive interviewing procedures employed and the lack of any corroborative evidence for the various allegations made. 12. Similar apparent miscarriages of justice have occurred elsewhere in other cases...

3. Child and youth offending statistics in New Zealand 1992 to 2007 [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...impossible to guarantee perfect accuracy even in the best of circumstances, because of the enormous number of charges. Incorrect codes are occasionally entered into the computer system, and duplicate records sometimes arise for a variety of reasons (e.g. appeals). Some of the data problems were corrected in the production of this report and, while there may be small errors in some of the figures shown, the data is sufficiently accurate to indicate trends over time in prosecutions, convic...

4. [2024] NZEnvC 136 Donaldson v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 6.4 MB]

   DONALDSON v QLDC- Correction IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 136 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal clause 14 of the First Schedule to the Act BETWEEN ROGER LINDSAY DONALDSON (ENV-2019-CHC-24) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: In chambers, on the papers Last case event: 12 April 2024 Dat...

5. Motiti Rohe Moana Trust and Others v Bay of Plenty Regional Council - Notes of Evidence - 27 November 2017 [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND ENV-2015-AKL-000134 ENV-2015-AKL-000140 ENV-2015-AKL-000141 BETWEEN MOTITI ROHE MOANA TRUST (ENV-2015-AKL-000134) NGĀTI MAKINO HERITAGE TRUST (ENV-2015-AKL-000140) NGĀTI RANGINUI IWI SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2015-AKL-000141) Appellants AND BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Hearing Commenced: 27 November 2017 held in Courtroom MERK w003 Court: Judge J Smith Judge D Kirkpatrick Commissioner K Prime

6. MLC - 05 Rule 5-11 schedule notification [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...Action A20120003744 13/03/2012 CJ 2012/02 - Pouaka Ngoungou - and succession orders made at 46 Waikato Maniapoto MB 353 on 15/11/1968 - Application to the Chief Judge 45/93 Hinemoa Inkster 1. Awaiting Administrative Action A20120007050 28/05/2012 Appeal 2012/4 - Mangatainoka No 1BC No 2C, Tamaki 2A1C Part (Lot DP7840) and Tamaki 2A2A (Balance) also known as Ngawapurua and Rua Roa Trusts - and a decision made at 15 Takitimu MB 4-14 on 29/3/2012 (A2007_11677 and A2008_3422) - and a deci...

7. January 2015 National Pānui [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...MÄORI APPELLATE COURT The applications listed below were received in the offi ce of the Chief Registrar up to the closing date of this pänui APPLICATION NO: SECTION: APPLICANT: SUBJECT: A20140012298 58/93 Omaio 43 Section 4 Ahu Whenua Trust Appeal 2014/8 - Omaio 43 Section 4 - and an Occupation Order made at 104 Waiariki MB 73-80 on 10/09/2014 - Appeal Kohi-Tätea / JANUARY 2015 - NATIONAL PÄNUI 21 ADVISORY SERVICES CLINICS AOTEA DISTRICT Lower Hutt Address: Te Puni Kokiri, L...

8. Strickland v Gaensicke [2011] NZWHT Auckland 46 [pdf, 273 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-100-000099 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 46 BETWEEN DAVID GEORGE AND KAREN JEAN STRICKLAND Claimants AND ANDRE JARGEN GAENSICKE First Respondent AND IAN SHARPLIN Second Respondent AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Third Respondent AND SHINGLE & SHAKE ROOFING LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND KEVIN GRANT BURROWS Fifth Respondent AND ROGER JAMES FRANKS Sixth Respondent AND KARL ROLAND GAENSICKE Sevent

9. LCRO 91/2017 DV v LS and HS (19 December 2018) [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...13 At [56]–[57]. 14 At [58]. 15 At [62]. 16 Deliu v Hong [2012] NZHC 158, [2012] NZAR 209 at [39]–[41]. 16 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that

10. [2023] NZEnvC 176 Prouse Trust Partnership v Horowhenua District Council [pdf, 8.3 MB]

    PROUSE TRUST PARTNERSHIP v HOROWHENUA DISTRICT COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 176 IN THE MATTER of appeals under cl 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN PROUSE TRUST PARTNERSHIP, S J & K M PROUSE (ENV-2022-WLG-000025) JAMES MCDONNELL LIMITED (ENV-2022-WLG-000026) Appellants AND HOROWHENUA DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge L J Semp...