Search Results

Search results for appeal.

14344 items matching your search terms

  1. [2023] NZEnvC 280 Titirangi Protection Group Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 3 MB]

    IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 280 IN THE MATTER of appeals under section 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN TITIRANGI PROTECTION GROUP INCORPORATED (ENV-2021-AKL-093) THE TREE COUNCIL (AUCKLAND) INCORPORATED (ENV-2021-AKL-094) Appellants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent AND WATERCARE SERVICES LIMITED Applicant Court: Chief Environment Court Judge D A Kirkpatrick...

  2. Independent Electoral Review Final Report Accessible word doc [docx, 9.5 MB]

    2 Final Report [image: Independent Electoral Review Logo] He Arotake Pōtitanga Motuhake Independent Electoral Review Final Report Our recommendations for a fairer, clearer, and more accessible electoral system November 2023 This report may be cited as: Independent Electoral Review, 2023. Final Report: Our Recommendations for a Fairer, Clearer, and More Accessible Electoral System. Wellington: New Zealand. ISBN 978-0-473-69963-5 (Print) ISBN 978-0-473-69964-2 (Online) [image:

  3. OIA-119289.pdf [pdf, 20 MB]

    Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 3 April 2025 Our ref: OIA 119289 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: s228, s229A, and s240 of the Crimes Act 1961 Thank you for your email and attached letter of 10 February 2025, requesting information under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), relating to s228, s229A, and s240 of the Crimes Act 1961. Specifically, you requested

  4. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 1 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 7.2 MB]

    .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317 (b) An approach to the supreme Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321 (c) Petitions and other direct appeals to the government . . . . . . . . . . 322 (7) Alleged Crown interference in the court’s processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 (a) Crown agents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....

  5. Roborgh v Lay [pdf, 303 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 00062 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN LYNNE ROBORGH and LEON JOHN ROBORGH Claimants AND No First or Second Respondents AND STEPHEN BRIAN LAY Third Respondent AND JESSOP TOWNSEND LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Fifth Respondent AND ARCHITECTURAL WATERPROOFING LIMITED (in Liquidation) Sixth Respondent AND No Seventh Respondent AND TIMOTHY

  6. Berry & Ors as Trustees of the Burns Berry Trust v Lay [pdf, 301 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 00136 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN ELIZABETH WAUGH BERRY, DONALD JEFFREY WAUGH BURNS and CLAIRE MARIE RYAN as Trustees of the Burns Berry Trust Claimants AND No First or Second Respondents AND STEPHEN BRIAN LAY Third Respondent AND JESSOP TOWNSEND LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Fifth Respondent AND ARCHITECTURAL WATERPROOFING LIMITED (in Liq

  7. Gray & Ors as Trustees of the John Gray Family Trust v Lay [pdf, 300 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 00027 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN JOHN RAYMOND GRAY, DEAN GRIMMOND and SANDRA MAY BARRY as Trustees of the John Gray Family Trust Claimants AND No First or Second Respondents AND STEPHEN BRIAN LAY Third Respondent AND JESSOP TOWNSEND LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Fifth Respondent AND ARCHITECTURAL WATERPROOFING LIMITED (in Liquidation) Si

  8. EL1 Ltd & Anor as Trustees of the Eurolife Trust v Lay [pdf, 290 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 00932 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN E L 1 LIMITED and M & H TRUSTEE SERVICES LIMITED as Trustees of the Eurolife Trust Claimants AND No First or Second Respondents AND STEPHEN BRIAN LAY Third Respondent AND JESSOP TOWNSEND LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Fifth Respondent AND ARCHITECTURAL WATERPROOFING LIMITED (in Liquidation) Sixth Respond

  9. Shepherd & Ors as Trustees of the Bell Shepherd Family Trust v Lay [pdf, 288 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 00939 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN MICHAEL DAVID SHEPHERD, FIONNA MOANA ANNE BELL and TODD WILLIAM HUNTER as Trustees of the Bell Shepherd Family Trust Claimants AND No First or Second Respondents AND STEPHEN BRIAN LAY Third Respondent AND JESSOP TOWNSEND LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Fifth Respondent AND ARCHITECTURAL WATERPROOFING LIMITED (

  10. Decision-of-Coroner-B-Windley-as-to-Scope-of-Issues-for-Inquiry-28-4-22-signed.pdf [pdf, 1 MB]

    ...inquiry is prescribed by the Act and it is well established that an inquest is a fact-finding exercise, not a method of apportioning guilt. [48] This is consistent with the approach in other common law jurisdictions. For example, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Coroner for the Birmingham Inquests (1974) v Hambleton observed:32 A decision on scope represents a coroner’s view about what is necessary, desirable and proportionate by way of investigation to enable the...