Search Results

1. Kani v MacDonald - Waimarama 3A6B6B Inc. (2021) 88 Takitimu MB 148 (88 TKT 148) [pdf, 331 KB]

   ...of the incorporation’s annual accounts; it was simply a question of costs, given the losses that had been made in recent years. 8 Watson v Parker - The Proprietors of Torere 64 Incorporated [2015] Māori Appellate Court MB 543 (2015 APPEAL 543) 9 82 Tākitimu MB 164-180 (82 TKT 164-180) at 169 88 Tākitimu MB 156 Kōrerorero Discussion [24] Section 277 of the Act states: 277 Appointment and duties of auditor (1) The shareholders of a large Maori incorporation...

2. 2021-03-15 D-G of Conservation opening subs [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...was intended when these flows were inserted into the RPW they would apply from October 2021 at the latest. 41. Mr de Pelsemaeker rejects the application of Schedule 2A minimum flows in relevant catchments, stating this is likely to reduce the appeal of the controlled activity pathway35. 42. By contrast, the evidence of Dr Allibone appeared to suggest that many Schedule 2A catchment deemed permit holders are currently operating and applying a de facto minimum flow regime36. 4...

3. Te Moni - Wharepouri Te Moni [2020] Chief Judge's MB 544 (2020 CJ 544) [pdf, 379 KB]

   ...and (b) If so, is it necessary in the interests of justice to remedy any mistake or omission. 14 [2009] Chief Judge’s MB 209-225 (2009 CJ 209) 15 [2010] Maori Appellate Court MB 167 (2010 APPEAL 167) 2020 Chief Judge’s MB 555 Did the Registrar make a mistake or was there was an omission in the presentation of facts? Kōrero - Discussion [14] The first issue is answered by reference to the application filed and...

4. Jarrett - Succession to Ngapeeti Haora [2020] Chief Judge's MB 561 (2020 CJ 561) [pdf, 311 KB]

   ...4 Ashwell - Rawinia or Lavinia Ashwell (nee Russell) [2009] Chief Judge’s MB 209 (2009 CJ 209) at [15] 5 Tau v Nga Whanau O Morven & Glenavy - Waihao 903 Section IX Block [2010] Māori Appellate Court MB 167 (2010 APPEAL 167) at [61] 2020 Chief Judge’s MB 572 the attached schedule reflects the agreement of the parties as the writing is hard to decipher. Furthermore, in the section relating to Ngapeke 1J2B2B2 the word “Esme” appears alon

5. Hamblyn v Auckland City Council [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...plans and that the bearer did not comply with the required standards. Having made those findings, Mr Vaughan must be held to have a degree of personal liability for actual construction defects. [46] Decisions from the High Court and Court of Appeal have all established that to be personally liable, a director needs to either assume some personal responsibility or needs to be directly involved in carrying out, supervising and/or controlling the defective work that has result...

6. [2019] NZEmpC 132 Chief Executive of Manukau Institute of Technology v Zivaljevic [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...provide that written statement within 14 days of receiving the Employee's request. 15.7 In the event the matter is not resolved by mediation, the matter may be referred to the Employment Relations Authority for decision. Either party may appeal the decision of the Employment Relations Authority to the Employment Court[.] [52] Mr Zivaljevic’s evidence was that, when his employment was terminated, he was initially focussed on the substantive issues, in particular around rede...

7. [2020] NZEmpC 110 Cowan v Kidd [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...rates 10 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 (PC). 11 Hickman v Turn and Wave Ltd [2011] NZCA 100, [2011] 3 NZLR 318 at [248]. This decision was overturned on appeal but not on this point: Hickman v Turn and Wave Ltd [2012] NZSC 72, [2013] 1 NZLR 741. 12 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd [2016] NZEmpC 95, [2016] ERNZ 591 at [70]. http://www.westlaw.co.nz/maf/wlnz/app/link/doc?uci=CASE~N...

8. Pickering v Reihana - Motatau 2 Section 21B2E (2021) 231 Taitokerau MB 103 (231 TTK 103) [pdf, 323 KB]

   ...The applicants were not represented in this proceeding, and so they have not framed their case according to legal principles. In essence, they claim that the house is held on constructive trust for Ngawiki. [30] In Lankow v Rose, the Court of Appeal held that, in order to recognise a constructive trust, the applicant must show:13 (a) Contributions, direct or indirect, to the property in question; (b) The expectation of an interest therein; (c) That such expectation is a reaso...

9. Government Response to Te Aka Matua o te Ture | Law Commission Report: The Use of DNA in Criminal Investigations | Te Whakamahi i te Ira Tangata i ngā Mātai Taihara [pdf, 825 KB]

   ...expectation of privacy), under section 21 of the NZBORA and wider privacy values.12 These are related to bodily integrity, bodily autonomy and the protection of personal information for the individual and their familial connections. 10. The Court of Appeal has also noted that retention of DNA profiles on the databanks enables ongoing monitoring by the state.13 The effects of the regime may also have discriminatory impacts, engaging the right to freedom from discrimination under s...

10. Apo v Hudson - Maraenui No 141 and other blocks (2019) 227 Waiariki MB 43 (227 WAR 43) [pdf, 293 KB]

    ...satisfactorily; or (b) because of lack of competence or prolonged absence, the trustee is or will be incapable of carrying out those duties satisfactorily. [27] The leading authority on the removal of trustees is Rameka v Hall.2 The Court of Appeal in this case held that there is a two-stage test to determine whether a trustee should be removed. Firstly, the court must be satisfied that the trustee has breached his or her responsibilities. Secondly, if so, the Court must deci...