Search Results

1. Notification of Applications Over 6 months old that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) - 28 February 2019 [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...8/06/2011 CJ 2011/19 - Ngapeeti Haora also known as Lillian Ngapeeti Marsh - and succession orders made at 44 Tauranga MB 90-91 on 11/11/1983 - Application to Chief Judge 45/93 Glenda Kay Jarrett 1. Awaiting Administrative Action A20110006610 11/07/2011 Appeal 2011/25 - Felix Appleton and a succession order made at 91 Opotiki MB 8-11 on 7 February 2006 - Application to the Chief Judge 45/93 Kelley Nyman 2. Awaiting Judicial Decision or Direction A20110006874 18/07/2011 Tiemi Ranapiri or Tieme R...

2. PC8 Urban Common Bundle - Volume 1 [pdf, 10 MB]

   i Regional Plan: Water for Otago Proposed Plan Change 8 (Discharge management) ISBN 978-0-908324-59-0 6 July 2020 CB0001 CB0002 Proposed Plan Change 8 (Discharge management) to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (6 July 2020) iii Introduction The Otago Regional Council has prepared Proposed Plan Change 8 (Discharge management) to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago. Proposed Plan Change 8 amends existing, a

3. [2024] NZEnvC 133 New Zealand Transport Agency - Waka Kotahi [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...after receiving the outline plan, the territorial authority may request the requiring authority to make changes to the outline plan and if the requiring authority decides not to make the changes requested, the territorial authority has a right of appeal against the decision to the Environment Court. In determining any such appeal, the Environment Court must consider whether the changes requested by the territorial authority will give effect to the purpose of this Act. 14 [29]...

4. [2019] NZEnvC 195 Clevedon North Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   !BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA [2019] NZEnvC \ q 5 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s120 of the Act BETWEEN CLEVEDON NORTH LIMITED (ENV-2019-AKL-029) Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J A Smith Commissioner R M Bartlett Hearing: 4 - 6 November 2019 Appearances: R E Bartlett QC for Clevedon North Limited S F Quinn for Auckland Council A Rennie for herself and J...

5. June 2016 National Pānui [pdf, 330 KB]

   Contents: Applications for hearing in MAY | HARATUA 2016: ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz JUNE | PIPIRI 2016 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confi rmed at the time of this publication are listed. For more information, plea

6. [2010] NZEmpC 103 Coy v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...most proceedings, this Court is cautious about accepting expert opinion evidence on the ultimate issue for the Court’s decision. Such evidence will be allowed where it will assist the Court: X at para [37] adopting the approach of the Court of Appeal in Attorney-General v Equiticorp Industries Group Ltd (in statutory management).3 [15] Ms McKechnie submitted, however, that advocacy masquerading as evidence will not assist the Court and should not be given. Again in X the Court...

7. [2012] NZEmpC 103 Progressive Meats Ltd v Pohio and others [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...Suggestions for change from staff are to be directed in writing through the relevant committee representative. A unanimous decision of the skills and training committee is required to allocate additional units to any department. 10.4. Employees may appeal to the skills and training committee regarding individual issues pertaining to the application of the training system. 10.5. Staff rotation between slaughter and processing, where staff levels allow, will be encouraged to...

8. [2009] NZEmpC AC 30/09 Masonry Design Solutions Ltd v Bettany [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...test, in the alternative, as whether the employee engaged in the conduct in question knowing that it would cause loss to his or her employer. [52] This is a matter of foreseeability. In this jurisdiction the principle was re- stated by the Court of Appeal in Attorney-General v Gilbert [2002] 2 NZLR 342 at 361-362 as follows: The loss must be “sufficiently linked to the breach of the particular duty to merit recovery in all the circumstances” (McElroy Milne v Commercial Electron...

9. [2006] NZEmpC WC 23/06 Spotless Services (NZ) Ltd v Morrison [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...contribution as contemplated by s124(a) is limited to the events of the dismissal, then this approach would be correct. However, s124 is couched generally and the Court should look beyond these events. This approach has been confirmed by the Court of Appeal in Waitakere City Council v Ioane2. When considering the employee’s contribution to the personal grievance, regard may be had to the relevant history of the employment relationship.

10. CAC306 v Zhou & Anor [2015] NZREADT 51 [pdf, 223 KB]

    ...penalty. We direct the Registrar to arrange a Directions Hearing between our Chairperson and the parties to timetable dealing with penalty in the usual way. [51] Pursuant to s.113 of the Act, we record that any person affected by this decision may appeal against it to the High Court by virtue of s.116 of the Act. ______________________________ Judge P F Barber Chairperson ______________________________ Ms N Dangen Member ______________________________ Ms...