Search Results

1. Singh v Singh and Scorpion Liquor (2006) Ltd [2016] NZHRRT 38 [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...Denyer v Scorpion Liquor (2006) Limited [2012] NZERA Auckland 448 5392831, 11 December 2012. 12 employees to sign the entries about them or confirm their hours because the diary was for his use only. [52] He accepted that he did not appeal either decision. Like his mother, he said the reason the wage arrears were not paid for 20 months was that his funds were frozen by the restraining orders. [53] Shane Singh said he assumed that all the mail delivered to Scorpion...

2. [2017] NZEnvC 180 Ngai te hapu Incorporated v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC \ 30 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals under s 120 of the Act BETWEEN NGAI TE HAPQ INCORPORATED (ENV-20 16-AKL -000042) NGA POTIKI A TAMAPAHORE TRUST (ENV-2016-AKL-000045) Appellants AND BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent AND ASTROLABE COMMUNITY TRUST Applicant Court: Environment Judge JA Smith Date of Decision: 31 October 2017 Date of Issue: 31 Oc...

3. Canterbury / Westland Standards Committee 3 v Johnson [2018] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 464 KB]

   ...by proffering unsought advice on the wisdom of the transaction. To hold otherwise could impose intolerable burdens on solicitors.” [97] Mr Waalkens submits that two further cases have added a gloss to this. In the Haira38 case. The Court of Appeal commented on the Clark Boyce dictum as follows: “We do not read the judgment as holding that a solicitor will never be under a duty, whether before or after accepting instructions, to offer advice on the wisdom of the transaction. Whe...

4. Chapman v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 364 KB]

   ...Fardell (as set out at [30]) has affirmed personal assumption of responsibility as a requirement of directors' personal liability in respect of a variety of duties of care. Notably, in Mahon v Crockett (1999) 8 NZCLC 262,043, the Court of Appeal acknowledged at [9]-[12] that the requirement of assumption of responsibility, as articulated in Trevor Ivory, generally applies to tortious causes of action against directors. [43] Assumption of responsibility in negligent constru...

5. [2019] NZEnvC 114 Pan Pac Forest Products Ltd [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...process the application to occupy more of the seabed consents as a variation of existing consent CL 1200580 and all consents and variations were granted by the Council on 16 September 2015. The Maungaharuru-Tangitu Trust ("the Trust") appealed the decision, seeking that the Environment Court decline the consents. (f) The appeal was the subject of an Environment Court hearing in August 2016, which considered the effects of the relocated discharge on the marine environment...

6. [2020] NZEmpC 230 Arachchige v Rasier New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 398 KB]

   ...been expressed about the rights of Uber drivers in many jurisdictions, and cases have been taken with mixed results. [23] At the time this case was being heard in New Zealand, a case was proceeding to the United Kingdom Supreme Court, with Uber appealing a finding that Uber drivers in the UK were “workers”. [24] Cases have also proceeded in other jurisdictions, including France, Australia, Canada and the United States of America. [25] Both parties acknowledge that the le...

7. [2020] NZIACDT 34 ZT v Li (20 July 2020) [pdf, 340 KB]

   ...January 2017, having invested only $322,245.41 in a QDII fund. His former immigration adviser had admitted that she had not been aware of the requirement to complete both the transfer and investment within the set timeframe. [60] The complainant appealed the decline of residence to the IPT. He was represented by a lawyer, not his present counsel. In a decision issued on 30 May 2018, it was found that Immigration New Zealand’s decision was correct. The complainant’s transfe...

8. [2019] NZEmpC 192 Johnson v Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force [pdf, 394 KB]

   ...allows an employee to bring a personal grievance if the employee’s employment, or one or more conditions thereof, is, or are, affected to the employee’s disadvantage by some unjustifiable action by the employer. [73] In 1989, the Court of Appeal was required to consider in Alliance Freezing Company (Southland) Ltd v New Zealand Engineering Workers etc Union whether the action involved had caused some material or financial loss.2 That court held that such a restriction was not...

9. [2022] NZEmpC 10 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [pdf, 376 KB]

   ANA SHAW v BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD [2022] NZEmpC 10 [4 February 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 10 EMPC 4/2019 EMPC 360/2019 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ANA SHAW Plaintiff AND BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: 15–17 June and 2 July 2021

10. Proactive-release-Re-written-Evidence-Regulations-6-July.pdf [pdf, 1023 KB]

    ...20. The second issue is the obligation to destroy video evidence 10 years after the court proceeding is finally determined or discontinued (or 7 years after it was made, if not used in court). Those obligations do not reflect modern practice around appeals, which can be initiated significantly after the 10-year period, or the recording’s potential value as propensity evidence4 in later cases. 21. I propose to remove the obligations so that, after the period the video evidence must be r...