Search Results

1. CAC 10064 v Jin [2013] NZREADT 57 [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...unusual and suspicious set of facts. [84] We find that misconduct has not been proved against the defendant. Accordingly the charges are dismissed. [85] Pursuant to s.113 of the Act, we record that any person affected by this decision may appeal against it to the High Court by virtue of s.116 of the Act. ______________________________ Judge P F Barber Chairperson ______________________________ Mr J Gaukrodger Member ______________________________...

2. [2015] NZEmpC 54 Goel v Director-General for Primary Industries [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...been a reasonable outcome in all the circumstances. nature of the work performed by him, and to be performed if he is to be reinstated, will be relevant. So too will such discretionary considerations as were identified by the Court of Appeal in R v Accused (CA357/94) 15 as including the right to have privacy, dignity and bodily integrity protected from non-consensual medical procedures. The “justice” of allowing a grievance to be determined out of time [51] Decisi...

3. ENVC Hearing 27Jul15 WML suppl rebuttal Maxwell Dunn [pdf, 962 KB]

   ...rebuttal evidence relates to the plans and associated information for a revised 112 berth marina and associated marina parking and public promenade/viewing platform deck that was provided by Waiheke Marinas Ltd (WML) to the Court and parties to the appeal on 22 May 2015. It responds to matters covered in the evidence of the following witnesses: (a) Mr Serjeant on behalf of Direction Matiatia Inc (DMI). (b) Ms Bremner on behalf of the Auckland Council (Council). 4. I have rea...

4. Rafiq v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2012] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...matters”. The letter also contained the following statements: If I get further upset I shall dismiss non European staffs if they listen to White people or act like Europeans in terms of language, names or addressing style. There is no right of appeal against my decision in relation to expulsion of ‘White snakes’ of IRD. … We do not pay tax to the government to feed the White snakes (Europeans) of Immigration New Zealand and Department of Labour. [10.5] In a letter dated 10 A...

5. Family legal aid fees - consultation paper [pdf, 816 KB]

   ...guideline hours for this step) Reporting to and invoicing for Legal Aid Repeat within 4 months $260 Discounted fees for repeat instructions by the same provider for the same applicant within each specified time-frame Repeat within 18 months $300 Appeal from Review Tribunal Activity Fees Tasks New instructions $240 For Receiving initial instructions and identifying legal and factual issues Preparing application for legal aid (and amendment to grant if expecting to exceed...

6. Legal aid final family consultation paper - 10 February 2012 [pdf, 816 KB]

   ...guideline hours for this step) Reporting to and invoicing for Legal Aid Repeat within 4 months $260 Discounted fees for repeat instructions by the same provider for the same applicant within each specified time-frame Repeat within 18 months $300 Appeal from Review Tribunal Activity Fees Tasks New instructions $240 For Receiving initial instructions and identifying legal and factual issues Preparing application for legal aid (and amendment to grant if expecting to exceed...

7. CAC 20005 v McGowan [2014] NZREADT 92 [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...set out above, there has been misconduct rather than the lower offence of unsatisfactory conduct. [52] For the above reasons we find the charge proved. [53] Pursuant to s.113 of the Act, we record that any person affected by this decision may appeal against it to the High Court by virtue of s.116 of the Act. ______________________________ Judge P F Barber Chairperson ______________________________ Ms N Dangen Member ______________________________ M...

8. CAC304 v Morris [2016] NZREADT 4 [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...papers only. We direct the Registrar to now arrange a Directions Hearing by phone of counsel with our Chairperson to fix procedure to deal with penalty. [85] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, we record that any person affected by this decision may appeal against it to the High Court by virtue of s 116 of the Act. ______________________________ Judge P F Barber Chairperson ______________________________ Mr G Denley Member ______________________________ Ms C...

9. Foot v Registrar of the REAA [2015] NZREADT 24 [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...is essential that consumers are able to rely on the honesty and integrity of real estate agents and be protected from any form of dishonesty. 17 [84] Pursuant to s.113 of the Act, we record that any person affected by this decision may appeal against it to the High Court by virtue of s.116 of the Act. ______________________________ Judge P F Barber Chairperson ______________________________ Mr J Gaukrodger Member ______________________________...

10. 2011 to 2014 Ministry of Justice statement of intent [pdf, 537 KB]

    ...We create a court environment where disputes and offences can be resolved, while maintaining the court system’s integrity and the judiciary’s independence. We administer and support the progression of cases in the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, High Court, District Courts, specialist courts and a range of tribunals and authorities. We ensure that courts are safe, and implement policy and legislative changes in the court system. We maintain the credibility of monetary penalt...