Search Results

1. [2020] NZEmpC 46 JCE v The Department of Corrections [pdf, 321 KB]

   ...coping techniques to enable her to remain in gainful employment the award for non-economic loss would have been higher.14 [50] In Gilbert, the Court awarded $75,000 for humiliation, anxiety and distress and that was not disturbed in the subsequent appeal. In that case the employee had been a probation officer exposed to unnecessary and avoidable workplace stress over many years, arising from work overload, management failure and office and resource deficiencies.15 He had suffered...

2. Matsuoka v E Tū Incorporated (Preservation Orders) [2018] NZHRRT 49 [pdf, 824 KB]

   ...internal departments and/or individuals who may have access to the Information of the obligations imposed by paragraph 1 (a) above. c That the above orders continue until further order of the Tribunal, or the conclusion of the proceedings (including any appeals). [7] The grounds on which the order are sought are as follows: a The Information sought by the plaintiff relates to events occurring as early as 2011. b The Tribunal is unlikely to hear and determine the plaintiffs case before...

3. Supplementary Regulatory Impact Statement: Extending the duration limit of Police safety orders [pdf, 667 KB]

   ...which affects the fairness and equity of the outcomes. There is a risk of poor judgement by police officers in making a decision to issue a PSO, and for what duration. This risk has significant consequences because there is no judicial oversight/appeal right. This contrasts with Australia and United Kingdom where there are links to court processes. The proposal also provides a greater risk to the wellbeing of the victim and associated people. The removal of the bound person from the a...

4. Complaints Assessment Committee 412 v Grewal, Preet & Co Real Estate Limited, Voordouw & Mason [2018] NZREADT 47 [pdf, 314 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 47 READT 051/17 IN THE MATTER OF charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BROUGHT BY COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE 412 AGAINST GURPREET GREWAL First Defendant AND PREET & CO REAL ESTATE LIMITED Second Defendant AND JOSEPH VOORDOUW Third Defendant AND GARRY MASON Fourth Defendant Hearing 13 July 2018, at Auckland

5. MLC 2018 December 2018 - OCR Outstanding Applications [pdf, 445 KB]

   ...Application to the Chief Judge A20180007223 58/93 Bryce Peda Smith Nuki o Te Hapu Tahawai ki Rataroa Whanau Trust and Nga Uri o Ngati Pakahi Trust - and orders appointing trustees made at 175 Taitokerau MB 257-326 on 12 July 2018 - Notice of Appeal A20180007241 45/93 Rudolph Bangu Hotu CJ 2018/30 Sections 57, 58, 70,72 and 100 of the Ratana Pa - and orders appointing trustees at 361 Whanganui MB 75-85 on 18 November 2016 - Application to the Chief Judge A20180007358 4...

6. MLC 2019 February - OCR Outstanding Applicaitons [pdf, 371 KB]

   ...216-222 on 19 March 2015 - Application to the Chief Judge A20180008889 58/93 Riki Ngatoki, Hayward Brown Ngaiotonga A3 - and a decision to dismiss an injunction application at 181 Taitokerau MB 165-184 dated 24 September 2018.- Notice of Appeal A20180009091 45/93 Rau Trevor Brown Te Irihanga 2A Block & 6 others - and a transfer of shares made at 31 Waikato-Maniapoto MB 180-191 on 25 October 2011 - Application to the Chief Judge

7. [2019] NZREADT 49 - CAC 521 v Wright (13 November 2019) [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...49 - Wright decision. The Tribunal will then issue a separate decision as to the costs application, in due course. [94] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out the right of appeal to the High Court. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. __________________ Hon P J Andrews Chairperson __________________ Mr J Doogue Member _...

8. [2022] NZREADT 15 – Complaints Assessment Committee 2108 v Rankin Tremain Real Estate Wairarapa Ltd (10 August 2022) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...working days of this decision. 3. Ordered to pay costs of $2,000 to the Authority within 20 working days of this decision. [136] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116, setting out the right of appeal to the High Court. D J Plunkett Chair G Denley Member N O’Connor Member

9. [2022] NZEmpC 141 E Tū Inc and ors v Carter Holt Harvey LVL Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...specify which of the “working days” in the 16 days off work at the end of a 160-day roster period were the specific alternative holiday for any public holiday that had been worked in the previous roster period.23 In that situation, the Court of Appeal said that it did not matter, either to the Fire Service Commission nor to any particular firefighter, which of the working days in the 16-day slot was an alternative day, as opposed to an annual leave day.24 In the circumstances,...

10. [2021] NZREADT 28 - New Zealand LJ International Limited & Zeng (15 June 2021) [pdf, 327 KB]

    ...Committee’s costs. The payment must be made to the Authority within 20 working days of the date of this decision. [93] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out the right of appeal to the High Court. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. _______________ Hon P J Andrews Chairperson _______________ Mr N O’Connor Member _______________...