14818 items matching your search terms
...fine of $14,000 to the Authority within 20 working days of this decision. 24 AJS Rental Realty Ltd, above n 10, at [24]. 15 [71] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116, setting out the right of appeal to the High Court. ___________________ Ms C Sandelin Deputy Chairperson ___________________ Mr G Denley Member ___________________ Ms F Mathieson Member
...ORDERS [55] Mr Hu is: 1. Censured. 2. Ordered to pay the sum of $25,000 to the Authority within one month of this decision. [56] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116, setting out the right of appeal to the High Court. PUBLICATION [57] Having regard to the interests of the public in the transparency of the Tribunal and knowing of wrongdoing by licensees, it is appropriate to order publication of this decision naming the licensee a...
...<www.employmentcourt.govt.nz>. 23 CG v Calendar Girls NZ Ltd EMPC Wellington 395/2024, 17 February 2025 at [1(e)]. 24 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [2020] NZEmpC 146 at [18]. [46] The Court was referred to a judgment from the Court of Appeal in E v R, in the criminal jurisdiction about whether a warning should invariably be given to juries about the risks of relying on demeanour to assess credibility.25 The issue was also considered by the Supreme Court i...
...– Waiwhetu Pā No 4 (2014) 319 Aotea MB 166 (319 AOT 166); Rātima v Sullivan – Tataraakina C (2015) 41 Tākitimu MB 102 (41 TKT 102); and Tata v Martin – Waiwhakaata 3E 4C Lot 2A (Hiiona Marae) [2020] Māori Appellate Court MB 166 (2020 APPEAL 166). 112 Tākitimu MB 268 [15] There are two exceptions. Expenses must be reasonably incurred. First, some trustees were reimbursed travel and accommodation expenses to attend an All Blacks game in Auckland in 2023. Althoug...
...place. That leads to difficulties, which I have already alluded to. 5 Employment Relations Act 2000, ss 3(1)(ii) and 189. 6 See E Tū Inc v Rasier Operations BV [2022] NZEmpC 192, [2022] ERNZ 966 at [83]-[90]. Upheld by the Court of Appeal: Rasier Operations BV v E Tū Inc [2024] NZCA 403. 7 Pilgrim (No 2), above n 2, at [41]. 8 At [53]. Where did the plaintiffs undertake their work? [12] The plaintiffs undertook work within the Gloriavale Community’s structur...
...[10] In order to make a costs order against a legally aided person, exceptional circumstances must apply. In this case, the Council submits that exceptional circumstances apply. It relies on Laverty v Para Franchising Ltd, where the Court of Appeal held that exceptional circumstances are not limited to that person’s conduct of litigation:8 We would not, however, confine the issue of exceptional circumstances to cases where the aided party’s conduct of the litigation warranted...
...to an environment whereby fraud could be perpetrated, though there was no evidence she was knowingly involved in the scam. [44] It was found that Ms Ma: 10 MM v Ma [2024] NZIACDT 10 (12 March 2024) at [43]. 11 Upheld by the District Court on appeal in Ma v [deleted] [2025] NZDC 1128; affirmed by the High Court in Ma v [deleted] [2025] NZHC 1826 at [31]–[33]. 12 EM v Ma [2024] NZIACDT 25. 11 1. Failed to conduct herself in a professional and diligent manner in failing to...
RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT 13 THE NORTHERN SOUTH ISLAND DR G A PHILLIPSON JUNE 1995 WORKING PAPER: FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District I: Auckland, R Daamen, P Ramer, B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District IIA: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith THE AUTHOR My name is Grant Phillipson and I completed a B.A. Hons. in histo
WAIHEKE MARINAS LTD MATIATIA MARINA Resource Consent Applications Assessment of Environmental Effects March 2013 REPORT QUALITY CONTROL Document Name Matiatia Marina Assessment of Environmental Effects Version Final Rev 2 Amended Date 28 May 2013 Document Reference AA0283 – ASL Matiatia Marina AEE Rev 2 Amended 28-05-13 Authors Title Signature Bevan Hudson Environmental Planner James Hendra Senior Environmental Planner Ma
Ministry of Justice Te Manatu Ture Discussion Paper Re-evaluation of the Human Rights Protections in New Zealand RE-EVALUATION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTIONS IN NEW ZEALAND REPORT FOR THE ASSOCIATE MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL HON. MARGARET WILSON 3 DISCLAIMER The Ministerial Re-evaluation of Human Rights Protections in New Zealand was written by an independent evaluation team for the Minister of Justice. The views expressed in it are those of the independent evalua