Search Results

1. Directory of Official Information A-C [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...Consent Authorities • Physical Sciences • Medical Testing • Metrology and Calibration • Radiology Services. Chairpersons of each PAC are members of the Accreditation Advisory Committee (AAC). The AAC and/or the Council may adjudicate any appeals arising from IANZ accreditations. Records Records are maintained on client registrations, assessments, reports and correspondences. A directory of IANZ accreditations is maintained and made available for public viewing on www.ian...

2. Directory of Official Information A-C [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...Consent Authorities • Physical Sciences • Medical Testing • Metrology and Calibration • Radiology Services. Chairpersons of each PAC are members of the Accreditation Advisory Committee (AAC). The AAC and/or the Council may adjudicate any appeals arising from IANZ accreditations. Records Records are maintained on client registrations, assessments, reports and correspondences. A directory of IANZ accreditations is maintained and made available for public viewing on www.ian...

3. [2008] NZEmpC WC 18/08 Arthur D Riley & Co Ltd v Wood [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...[42] The status and enforceability of internal employment policies and house rules has been the subject of a number of previous decisions some of which were referred to by Mr Vincent. The approach taken by the Court and endorsed by the Court of Appeal in an analogous case Sky Network Television Ltd v Duncan2 is that the ultimate question is not whether there was wilful disobedience to a lawful and reasonable instruction but rather whether the conduct of the worker justified dismiss...

4. [2009] NZEmpC CC 12/09 Service & Food Workers Union v Sanford Ltd [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...likely to have an adverse effect on their assessment they will be advised of that situation by the Employer in order that they have the opportunity to correct it. 18.14 If an Employee is not satisfied with their grading or assessment they may appeal to the Factory Manager whose decision is final. The Employee may have the right to involve a Union Delegate at this stage. Any disagreement over the interpretation or application of this clause may be subject to the appropriate pr...

5. Taueki v Trustees of Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Part Reservation Trust (2013) 306 Aotea MB 175 (306 AOT 175) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...the resolution. This led to an altercation with Mr Taueki and some damage to the building. 1 Rudd Senior v Proctor – Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Trust (2012) 2012 Māori Appellate Court MB 107 (2012 APPEAL 107) 2 Six for, one against, one abstention, and one trustee did not vote due to a conflict. 306 Aotea MB 177 [8] By application dated 2 April 2013 Mr Taueki applied for an urgent interim injunction restraining the Trust from de...

6. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v CAL2012-E000627 [2013] NZCOP 9 [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...Tribunal now turns to consider each of those matters. 4 See for example, [2013] NZCOP 2 at para 64. 11 Regulation 12(3)(a) – the flagrancy of the Infringement [67] The New Zealand Court of Appeal has addressed the meaning of “flagrancy” of copyright infringement, in the context of the making of “additional damages” awards under s.121(2) of the Copyright Act 1994.5 Those cases show that “flagrant” copyright infringe...

7. CAC20006 v Stevenson [2013] NZREADT 56 [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...Committee within 21 days of the date of this order. • Any reply by Mr Stevenson 21 days thereafter. • Any reply by the Complaints Assessment within a further 5 days of this order. [50] The Tribunal draws the parties’ attentions to the appeal provisions contained in s 116 of the Act. ______________________________ Ms K Davenport QC Chairperson ______________________________ Mr G Denley Member ______________________________ Ms N Dangen Member...

8. CAC 10031 v Lum-On [2012] NZREADT 30 [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...of this order. Mr Lum-On to file any submissions he wishes to make 10 days thereafter and the Complaints Assessment Committee to reply two days thereafter. [44] In accordance with s 113 of the Act the Tribunal advises the parties of the right to appeal this decision to the High Court pursuant to s 116 of the Act. DATED at WELLINGTON this 1st day of June 2012 ______________________________ Ms J Robson Member ______________________________ Mr G Denley Member...

9. Auckland Standards Committee v Fendall [2012] NZLCDT 1 [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...9 In Bolton v Law Society, supra, and as noted in [38] above 10 [1998] 1 NZLR 750 at 758 lines 32 - 46 11 See Waikato/Bay of Plenty District Law Society v Harris [2006] 3 NZLR 755 at 780 para 121 (Court of Appeal) 10 by her errors totalling $17,366 out of total billings over the period of $1,210,000, and the fact that the errors occurred on relatively few days compared to the number of days examined in the 31 month period covered by the audi

10. CAC306 v Zhou & Anor [2016] NZREADT 12 [pdf, 212 KB]

    ...with the prosecution and that both defendants are remorseful. [59] Accordingly, we hereby order that the licence of each of them is forthwith cancelled. [60] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, we record that any person affected by this decision may appeal against it to the High Court by virtue of s 116 of the Act. [2016] NZREADT 12 - Zhou and She 13 ______________________________ Judge P F Barber Chairperson ______________________________ Ms N Dangen Memb...