Search Results

Search results for appeal.

14821 items matching your search terms

  1. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 1 Tauranga Moana [pdf, 13 MB]

    T   A   U    R    A     N    G     A  M   O  A     N     A 1  8  8  6    –    2  0  0  6 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W  A  I  T A  N    G 

  2. Waitangi Tribunal - District 13 Part 2 Northern South Island [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    RA N G A H A U A WH A N U I DI S T R I C T 13 THE NORTHERN SOUTH ISLAND DR G A PHILLIPSON PA R T I I OC T O B E R 1996 WO R K I N G PA P E R : FI R S T RE L E A S E WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District 1: Auckland, R Daamen, P Hamer, and B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District 11a: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith District 11b: Hawke’s Bay, D Cowi

  3. 0323323-Ministry-of-Justice_National-Panui-May-2023-PROOF.pdf [pdf, 823 KB]

    ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz MAY | HARATUA 2023 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confirmed at the time of this publication are listed. For more information, please contact your local Mäori Land Court office. Individual

  4. Waitangi Tribunal - District 11 Hawkes Bay [pdf, 4.8 MB]

    RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT lIB HAWKE'S BAY DEAN COWIE SEPTEMBER 1996 WORKING PAPER: FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District 1: Auckland, R Daamen, P Ramer, and B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District l1A: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith District 12: The Wellington District, Dr R Anderson and K Pickens District 13: The Nor

  5. [2011] NZEmpC 128 McKean v Ports of Auckland Ltd [pdf, 130 KB]

    ...that they were acting in a union capacity at the time. [26] Analogies can usefully be drawn to the cases relating to disciplinary proceedings for conduct outside of working hours. In Smith v Christchurch Press Company Ltd 11 the Court of Appeal declined to categorise conduct outside of work that might lead to disciplinary proceedings (noting that situations are variable) but held that there must be “a clear relationship between the conduct and the employment”. The Court o...

  6. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – summary record 15th-17th reports (continued) [pdf, 63 KB]

    ...intervene in matters relating to the Immigration Act. Considering that the powers attributed to the Commission enabled it to act, the New Zealand Government continued to think that it was preferable for practical reasons to keep to the complaints and appeal procedures set out in the Immigration Act. As a safeguard, victims enjoyed the protection of the Bill of Rights 1990 or could lodge complaints against any discriminatory conduct on the part of immigration officials. The Human Rights Com...

  7. Pirika v Mita - The Estate of Nepia Enoka Mita [2014] Chief Judge's MB 685 (2014 CJ 685) [pdf, 373 KB]

    ...burden of proof is on the Applicant to rebut the two presumptions above; and 1 Tau v Nga Whānau O Morven & Glenavy – Waihao 903 Section 1X Block [2010] Māori Appellate Court MB 167 (2010 APPEAL 167); Ashwell – Rawinia or Lavinia Ashwell (nee Russell) [2009] Chief Judge’s MB 209-225 (2009 CJ 209). 2 At [15]. 2014 Chief Judge’s MB 695  As a matter of public interest, it is necessary for the Chief Judge to uph...

  8. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v TCLE-A-T5877102 [2013] NZCOP 2 [pdf, 75 KB]

    ...and that it must consider the three matters listed at subcl.(3)(a) – (c) of the Regulation. The Tribunal now turns to consider each of those matters. Regulation 12(3)(a) – the flagrancy of the Infringement [71] The New Zealand Court of Appeal has addressed the meaning of “flagrancy” of copyright infringement, in the context of the making of “additional damages” awards under s.121(2) of the Copyright Act 1994.3 Those cases show that “flagrant” copyright infring...

  9. [2014] NZEmpC 137 Pollard Contracting Ltd v Donald [pdf, 130 KB]

    ...12 Employment Relations Act 2000, s 101(ab). 13 Board of Trustees of Te Kura Kaupapa Motuhake O Tawhiuau v Edmonds [2008] ERNZ 139 (EmpC) at [42]. 14 At [40]. 15 A point which was confirmed by the Court of Appeal in Morgan v Whanganui College Board of Trustees [2014] NZCA 340, at [30]. c) Since the position is clear from the statute itself, it is unnecessary to resort to extrinsic materials to discern legislative intent. Consequently,

  10. [2014] NZEmpC 194 Commissioner of Police v Coffey [pdf, 127 KB]

    ...for instance, to really sedation or recession. In this context, the parties' intentions, the width of the changes and the nature of those changes will all be relevant considerations. [45] In the recent case of Teat v Willcocks the Court of Appeal, in considering whether a contract had been varied, said: 10 Although the position is not yet settled, we consider that consideration in the form of the benefit "in practice" is sufficient to support a binding variation....