Search Results

1. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - summary record 5th report [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...what role the New Zealand Human Rights Commission would play in that process. Lastly, the Government’s position on the judicial creation of new remedies as stated in the report was inconsistent with that of the Attorney-General in the Court of Appeal in the case of Attorney-General of New Zealand v. Chapman. 36. Referring to question 5, she requested information on how prisoners’ claims currently covered by the Prisoners’ and Victims’ Claims Act would be treated after key pro...

2. CAC20004 v Whisker [2015] NZREADT 61 [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...towards penalty whether by a further hearing about penalty or, by consent, with a series of succinct submissions about penalty on the papers. 16 [93] Pursuant to s.113 of the Act, we record that any person affected by this decision may appeal against it to the High Court by virtue of s.116 of the Act. ______________________________ Judge P F Barber Chairperson ______________________________ Mr G Denley Member ______________________________ Ms C...

3. Gisborne District Council v Hautapu – Tātarahake No 1 (2013) 27 Tairawhiti MB 295 (27 TRW 295) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...importance of the matter and, according to the Māori Appellate Court, after having regard to the principles in the Preamble, s 2 and s 17 of the Act.19 18 [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 284 (2011 Appeal 284) and Cumming - Omaio 8 and Omaio 45 (2009) 12 Waiariki Appellate MB 299 (12 AP 299); and see also Māori Land Court approach in Hunter - Harataunga East 2B2B1 & 2D2 [2004] 106 Hauraki MB 128 (106 H 128), cf Ashby - Oramahoe 1...

4. CAC 10064 v Jin [2013] NZREADT 57 [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...unusual and suspicious set of facts. [84] We find that misconduct has not been proved against the defendant. Accordingly the charges are dismissed. [85] Pursuant to s.113 of the Act, we record that any person affected by this decision may appeal against it to the High Court by virtue of s.116 of the Act. ______________________________ Judge P F Barber Chairperson ______________________________ Mr J Gaukrodger Member ______________________________...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 54 Goel v Director-General for Primary Industries [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...been a reasonable outcome in all the circumstances. nature of the work performed by him, and to be performed if he is to be reinstated, will be relevant. So too will such discretionary considerations as were identified by the Court of Appeal in R v Accused (CA357/94) 15 as including the right to have privacy, dignity and bodily integrity protected from non-consensual medical procedures. The “justice” of allowing a grievance to be determined out of time [51] Decisi...

6. ENVC Hearing 27Jul15 WML suppl rebuttal Maxwell Dunn [pdf, 962 KB]

   ...rebuttal evidence relates to the plans and associated information for a revised 112 berth marina and associated marina parking and public promenade/viewing platform deck that was provided by Waiheke Marinas Ltd (WML) to the Court and parties to the appeal on 22 May 2015. It responds to matters covered in the evidence of the following witnesses: (a) Mr Serjeant on behalf of Direction Matiatia Inc (DMI). (b) Ms Bremner on behalf of the Auckland Council (Council). 4. I have rea...

7. Rafiq v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2012] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...matters”. The letter also contained the following statements: If I get further upset I shall dismiss non European staffs if they listen to White people or act like Europeans in terms of language, names or addressing style. There is no right of appeal against my decision in relation to expulsion of ‘White snakes’ of IRD. … We do not pay tax to the government to feed the White snakes (Europeans) of Immigration New Zealand and Department of Labour. [10.5] In a letter dated 10 A...

8. Family legal aid fees - consultation paper [pdf, 816 KB]

   ...guideline hours for this step) Reporting to and invoicing for Legal Aid Repeat within 4 months $260 Discounted fees for repeat instructions by the same provider for the same applicant within each specified time-frame Repeat within 18 months $300 Appeal from Review Tribunal Activity Fees Tasks New instructions $240 For Receiving initial instructions and identifying legal and factual issues Preparing application for legal aid (and amendment to grant if expecting to exceed...

9. Legal aid final family consultation paper - 10 February 2012 [pdf, 816 KB]

   ...guideline hours for this step) Reporting to and invoicing for Legal Aid Repeat within 4 months $260 Discounted fees for repeat instructions by the same provider for the same applicant within each specified time-frame Repeat within 18 months $300 Appeal from Review Tribunal Activity Fees Tasks New instructions $240 For Receiving initial instructions and identifying legal and factual issues Preparing application for legal aid (and amendment to grant if expecting to exceed...

10. CAC 20005 v McGowan [2014] NZREADT 92 [pdf, 74 KB]

    ...set out above, there has been misconduct rather than the lower offence of unsatisfactory conduct. [52] For the above reasons we find the charge proved. [53] Pursuant to s.113 of the Act, we record that any person affected by this decision may appeal against it to the High Court by virtue of s.116 of the Act. ______________________________ Judge P F Barber Chairperson ______________________________ Ms N Dangen Member ______________________________ M...