Search Results

Search results for appeal.

14610 items matching your search terms

  1. MLC 2019 February - OCR Outstanding Applicaitons [pdf, 371 KB]

    ...216-222 on 19 March 2015 - Application to the Chief Judge A20180008889 58/93 Riki Ngatoki, Hayward Brown Ngaiotonga A3 - and a decision to dismiss an injunction application at 181 Taitokerau MB 165-184 dated 24 September 2018.- Notice of Appeal A20180009091 45/93 Rau Trevor Brown Te Irihanga 2A Block & 6 others - and a transfer of shares made at 31 Waikato-Maniapoto MB 180-191 on 25 October 2011 - Application to the Chief Judge

  2. [2019] NZREADT 49 - CAC 521 v Wright (13 November 2019) [pdf, 287 KB]

    ...49 - Wright decision. The Tribunal will then issue a separate decision as to the costs application, in due course. [94] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out the right of appeal to the High Court. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. __________________ Hon P J Andrews Chairperson __________________ Mr J Doogue Member _...

  3. [2022] NZEmpC 141 E Tū Inc and ors v Carter Holt Harvey LVL Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

    ...specify which of the “working days” in the 16 days off work at the end of a 160-day roster period were the specific alternative holiday for any public holiday that had been worked in the previous roster period.23 In that situation, the Court of Appeal said that it did not matter, either to the Fire Service Commission nor to any particular firefighter, which of the working days in the 16-day slot was an alternative day, as opposed to an annual leave day.24 In the circumstances,...

  4. [2021] NZREADT 28 - New Zealand LJ International Limited & Zeng (15 June 2021) [pdf, 327 KB]

    ...Committee’s costs. The payment must be made to the Authority within 20 working days of the date of this decision. [93] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out the right of appeal to the High Court. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. _______________ Hon P J Andrews Chairperson _______________ Mr N O’Connor Member _______________...

  5. [2021] NZREADT 36 - Lindsay-Penalty (13 July 2021) [pdf, 279 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 36 READT 002/2021 IN THE MATTER OF charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BROUGHT BY COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE 1907 AGAINST BRUCE ANDREW LINDSAY Defendant Hearing 24 May 2021 (further submissions received after the hearing) Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Mr G Denley, Member Mr N O’Connor, Member Ap

  6. [2022] NZREADT 16 - CAC 2102 v He & An (15 August 2022) [pdf, 172 KB]

    ...decision. Written submissions on behalf of Mr He and Mr An are to be filed and served within a further 10 working days. [117] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out the right of Appeal to the High Court. The procedure to be followed is set out in Part 20 of the High Court Rules 2016. ___________________ Mrs C Sandelin Deputy Chairperson ___________________ Mr G Denley Member ________...

  7. Z v Secretary for Justice [2023] NZRA 001 (28 March 2023) [pdf, 306 KB]

    ...researching the law, interviewing witnesses, briefing of evidence, drafting documents, examining witnesses, cross-examination, making submissions, making opening/closing addresses, appearing at sentence, and appearances in support of or in response to an appeal. 5 AE v Secretary for Justice [2012] NZRA 005 at [15]. 6 At [16]. 7 At [17]. 9 [39] In a later case, SB v Secretary for Justice8, the Review Authority confirmed that the concept of substantial and active involveme...

  8. LCRO 103/2022 RP v DQ (25 September 2024) [pdf, 272 KB]

    ...material before the Committee was considered in the course of this review. Nature and scope of review [51] The High Court has described a review by this Office in the following way:26 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determination are entitled to a review based on the LCRO’s own opinion rather than on deference to the view of the Committee. A review by the LCRO is informal, inquisitorial and robust. It involv...

  9. [2025] NZREADT 10 - CAC 2105 v Chen & Stevenson & Buy West Realty Limited (14 April 2025) [pdf, 379 KB]

    ...working days of this decision. 3. Ordered to pay costs of $20,757.23 to the Authority within 20 working days of this decision. [113] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116, setting out the right of appeal to the High Court. PUBLICATION [114] In light of the outcome of this decision and having regard to the interests of the parties and of the public, it is proper to order publication of the decision of the Tribunal without identifyi...