Search Results

1. Pomare v Pomare - Hongoeka 1B Parts and Hongoeka 1B1 (2024) 492 Aotea MB 5 (492 AOT 5) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   492 Aotea MB 5 Pōmare v Pōmare – Hongoeka 1B Parts and Hongoeka 1B1 (2024) 492 Aotea MB 5 (492 AOT 5) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District AP-20230000024751 A20180006200 WĀHANGA Under Sections 18, 215 and 328 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Hongoeka 1B Parts and Hongoeka 1B1 Block, Hongoeka 2A Section 1, Hongoeka 2B Section 1B, Hongoeka No.6 B,

2. 2021-03-12 ORC PC7 - Transcript - up to end of day 3 [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...desirability of preparing a regional plan when the implementation of a NPSFM arises, or is likely to arise. [99] It is also important to bear in mind that the Environment Court’s jurisdiction 20 is functionally limited. It is confined by the scope of appeals, and in turn further limited by the scope of submissions and further submissions. I agree with Mr Maassen’s submission that the Environment Court does not sit in an executive plan-making and plan-changing role. That is t...

3. Notification of Applications Over 6 months old that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) - 31 August 2019 [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 31 August 2019 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 31 August 2019, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Māori

4. Notification of Applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) - 31 May 2019 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...Winikerei Manukau - and succession orders made at 30 Mercer MB 141 (31 January 1947) - Application to the Chief Judge. 45/93 Louisana Pukuhuia Leaf-Hetaraka 1. Awaiting Administrative Action A20160004782 17/08/2016 S 98/93 - Special Aid - Waipapa 1D2B3B Appeal - (Leslie Erle Flight) J Koning 98(3)/93 John Koning 1. Awaiting Administrative Action A20160004868 22/08/2016 CJ 2016/27 - Titi Islands - Descendants of William Fisher and a succession order made at 20 South Island MB 160 on 11 December...

5. 2021-03-23 Transcript up to end of day 9 [pdf, 4.5 MB]

   ...desirability of preparing a regional plan when the implementation of a NPSFM arises, or is likely to arise. [99] It is also important to bear in mind that the Environment Court’s jurisdiction 20 is functionally limited. It is confined by the scope of appeals, and in turn further limited by the scope of submissions and further submissions. I agree with Mr Maassen’s submission that the Environment Court does not sit in an executive plan-making and plan-changing role. That is t...

6. [2024] NZEnvC 247 Allied Asphalt Limited [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...operative in 2004. The understanding of the complex issues involved was improved substantially by the collaborative efforts of six independent and highly qualified and experienced air quality experts assisting the Court during the hearing of the appeals.37 [70] The MMA was gazetted as a polluted airshed by the Minister for the Environment on 28 November 2019 because of exceedances of the PM10 threshold in the NESAQ. The MMA will remain a polluted airshed until the PM10 standard...

7. [2010] NZEmpC 72 Horton v Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...in Honda NZ Ltd v NZ (with exceptions) Shipwrights etc Union5. This too was a case where an employee was dismissed for unauthorised possession of company property, removing a can that contained thinners from Honda’s premises. The Court of Appeal upheld the Labour Court’s formulation of the standard of proof as follows: (i) A charge of the greatest gravity had been levelled against the worker and the burden of justifying the dismissal was, of course, on the respondent employe...

8. [2006] NZEmpC AC 63/06 Whelan v Attorney-General for CE of the Children and Young Persons Service [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...but reduced it for some mitigating factors relating to the counselling he had received to $45,000. In making that assessment I had regard to recent cases dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder or similar injuries. In Gilbert the Court of Appeal did not interfere with an award of $75,000 for general compensatory damages for distress. In Brickell v Attorney-General [2000] 2 ERNZ 529 the High Court awarded $75,000 and in Benge v Attorney-General [2000] 2 ERNZ 234 some four month...

9. Nga Hau e Wha National Marae Charitable Trust – Nga Hau e Wha Marae (2013) 20 Te Waipounamu MB 152 (20 TWP 152) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...to permit such development, it must ask itself whether or not the reservation status should remain in respect of the whole of the land. 20 Te Waipounamu MB 174 [85] Ruka – Taheke 23A and 23B [2010] Māori Appellate Court MB 629 (2010 APPEAL 629) dealt with registration of those blocks under the Māori freehold land registration project. At [54] the Court stated: the marae buildings are located at the western end of the envelope the eastern end could provide for grounds...

10. CAC301 v Murphy [2015] NZREADT 42 [pdf, 211 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZREADT 42 READT 070/14 IN THE MATTER OF charges laid under s.91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (per CAC 301) Prosecutor AND GARY MURPHY & PROPERTY LINK GROUPS LTD Defendants MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Ms N Dangen - Member Ms C Sandelin - Member HEARD at AUCKLAND on 12, 13, and 23 March 2015 DATE OF THIS DECISIO