14606 items matching your search terms
IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 134 ARC 1/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BRENDON RICHARD BOOTH Plaintiff AND BIG KAHUNA HOLDINGS LIMITED Defendant ARC 84/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BRENDON RICHARD BOOTH Plaintiff AND BIG KAHUNA HOLDINGS LIMITED D
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 26 READT 38/15 IN THE MATTER OF charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE (per CAC 402) Prosecutor AND MS TANYA DUNHAM of Tauranga, Real Estate Salesperson Defendant MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Member Ms N Dangen - Member HEARD at TAURANGA on 3 December 2015 (with subsequent series o
...challenged in the High Court. The Tribunal and the legal system The Tribunal is part of New Zealand’s judicial system. This comprises a range of bodies, including: . the general courts (such as the District Court, the High Court, and the Court of Appeal); . specialist courts (such as the Maori Land Court, the Fam- ily Court, and the Environment Court); . various tribunals (such as the Disputes Tribunal and the Residential Tenancies Tribunal); and 3 0 5 25 75 95 100 0 5 25...
...claiming general damages of $10,000.00 for the significant and humiliation that has been caused by the leaks in their house. 7.7 I do not need to provide an extensive review of the authorities concerning jurisdiction as it has been held on appeal from other WHRS determinations that adjudicators have the power and jurisdiction to make awards of general damages – Waitakere City Council v Smith, Auckland District Court, CIV 2004- 090-1757, Judge McElrea, 28 January 2005; Young &a...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2007-100-000064 BETWEEN PAUL WHITE and WILNA WHITE Claimants AND RODNEY DISTRICT COUNCIL First Respondent AND LORELLE JOY KERKIN (Solely and in her capacity as sole trustee of the Estate of Gregory William Kerkin) Second Respondent Hearing: 27th, 28th and 29th January 2009 11th February 2009 Counsel Appearances: G Shand and H Diamond-Cate, counsel for claimants; D Heaney SC and S Macky, counsel for first respondent
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-101-000037 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 30 BETWEEN SIMON WRIGHT AND CHRISTINE ARGYLE Claimants AND MACDEE MCLENNAN CONSTRUCTION LIMITED First Respondent AND DUNCAN MCLENNAN Second Respondent AND PORIRUA CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND ALAN HEATHCOTE (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND COLIN PROUSE Fifth Respondent AND GERRY KNOL Sixth Respondent Hearing: 23 June 2011 Appearances: Richard Johnstone
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2010-100-000112 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 4 BETWEEN ROGER JERZY AND SAMANTHA KAY ZAGORSKI Claimant AND WILKINSON BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITED First Respondent AND ALLIED HOUSE INSPECTIONS LIMITED Second Respondent AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Third Respondent AND RICHARD ANDREW JOHN WILKINSON Fourth Respondent AND CATHERINE WILKINSON Fifth Respondent AND TIMOTHY JOHN BURCHER Sixth Respondent AND HITEX BUIL
...had a non-delegable duty of care to subsequent owners of the property, and this has been followed in numerous High Court and WHRS determinations. I accept this submission, and suggest that the situation was clearly established by the Court of Appeal in Mt Albert Borough Council v Johnson [1979] 2 NZLR 234, when Cooke J said, at page 241: “There appears to be no authority directly in point on the duty of such a development company. We would hold that it is a duty to see that p...
KAMLESH PRASAD v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND REGISTRY [2017] NZEmpC 150 [29 November 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY [2017] NZEmpC 150 EMPC 253/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN KAMLESH PRASAD First Plaintiff AND LIUTOFAGA TULAI Second Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant AND SO
...tapu, it is our turangawaewae.. It is our taonga whenua tuku iho, our ancestral land. It is deep. There is that void between what Mr Unsworth is proposing. As I say, and agree, within the law there is no reason why this should not go ahead. I appeal though on the grounds of tikanga.” [27] George Matthews also referred to the importance of income from the land and how this would be helpful in assisting one of his siblings who was seriously ill and a niece, Ms Ritchie who is blind...