14606 items matching your search terms
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 31 October 2024 Ref: OIA 116430 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Audio Visual technologies Thank you for your email of 4 October 2024, to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), a copy of the review of the current state of the Audio-Visual (AV) re
...desirability of preparing a regional plan when the implementation of a NPSFM arises, or is likely to arise. [99] It is also important to bear in mind that the Environment Court’s jurisdiction 20 is functionally limited. It is confined by the scope of appeals, and in turn further limited by the scope of submissions and further submissions. I agree with Mr Maassen’s submission that the Environment Court does not sit in an executive plan-making and plan-changing role. That is t...
...double check that that was appropriate? 10 THE COURT: JUDGE BORTHWICK I think that’s appropriate, I mean this isn’t a contest as between the parties if you like as the normal contests that we would receive in the Environment Court on appeal. If there’s a contest its as between yourself and this proposed plan change and so yourself and the client that Mr Maw represents. So no party 15 needs to be here save to run their on case and that’s an advantage that you are here...
...work now cast upon it, and which it cannot understand - it would also relieve the Courts of much labour. The Maori real-estate management would practically devolve on the Board. The Trust Commissioners' Courts, the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal, the officials of the Stamp and Registration Offices, the Survey Department, the Native Department, and the Native Land Court would be more or less relieved; while the Public Trust Office would be delivered from the burden of administering...
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 142 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN NEIL CONSTRUCTION LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-165) Appellant AND FAR NORTH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J A Smith Environment Judge K G Reid Environment Commissioner S Myers Environment Commissioner G Paine Hearing: 11 – 15 March 2023 Last case event: 15 M...
...desirability of preparing a regional plan when the implementation of a NPSFM arises, or is likely to arise. [99] It is also important to bear in mind that the Environment Court’s jurisdiction 20 is functionally limited. It is confined by the scope of appeals, and in turn further limited by the scope of submissions and further submissions. I agree with Mr Maassen’s submission that the Environment Court does not sit in an executive plan-making and plan-changing role. That is t...
t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 2 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo
The Domestic Violence 1995 Act 42 day ‘rules’, and the Children, Young Persons and Their Families Act 1989 60 day ‘rule’ A report commissioned by the Department for Courts June 2002 Helena Barwick and Alison Gray Disclaimer This research was commissioned by the Department for Courts. The report has been prepared by the authors and the views expressed in it are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department for Courts. Contents Summary......
1 ALCOHOL REFORM 2010: REGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT Contents AGENCY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ................................................................................................. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 3 INDICATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................... 4 PART 1 – ALCOHOL IN NEW
MUNZ AND ORS V TLNZ LTD AND ANOR AK AC 51A/07 21 December 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 51A/07 ARC 34/07 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority and for declarations and injunction BETWEEN MARITIME UNION OF NEW ZEALAND INC First Plaintiff AND HENRY NEE NEE AND HENRY TOLEAFOA Second Plaintiffs AND TONY SMART Third Plaintiff AND TLNZ LTD First Defendant AND TLNZ (AUCKLAND) LIMITED Second Defendant