Search Results

1. Appendix-13-Combined-Section-92-NOR-and-Resource-Consents.pdf [pdf, 771 KB]

   ...Applicant please provide the reference in the proposed consent conditions that reflect this riparian planting to help manage this effect on flying insects? Technical Assessment H – Water Quality 45. Regarding Para 50 (Page 26), as all of the appeals have been determined by consent order and are deemed operative, could the Applicant please undertake an assessment of: 10 a) The current state of the waterways affected by this proposal within the Greater Wellington Region in com...

2. Granting Aid for Waitangi Tribunal Matters Policy v3.pdf [pdf, 522 KB]

   ...Aid Services accepts that claimants will generally require legal representation because of the distinct nature and complexity of Tribunal proceedings. Claimants only have one chance to establish their case before the Tribunal as there is no right of appeal. 52. Substantial hardship - Includes but is not limited to financial hardship (i.e., the claimant(s) do not have the financial resources to pursue their claim). It may also include consideration of the consequences of the claimants no...

3. [2024] NZIACDT 17 – LB v Luv (23 May 2024) [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...provisions of the Code: 21 General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professional, diligent and respectful and conduct themselves with due care and in a timely manner. Futile immigration matters 9. If a proposed application, appeal, request or claim is futile, grossly unfounded, or has little or no hope of success, a licensed immigration adviser must: … b. if the client still wishes to make or lodge the immigration matter, obtain written acknowledgement f...

4. [2024] NZREADT 48 – CAC2105 v Chen, Stevenson & Buy West Realty (18 December 2024) [pdf, 565 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2024] NZREADT 48 Reference No: READT 027/2022 IN THE MATTER OF Charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BROUGHT BY COMPLAINTS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE 2105 AGAINST YU-YUAN (LILLIAN) CHEN First Defendant AND DIANE STEVENSON Second Defendant AND BUY WEST REALTY Third Defendant Hearing in Auckland on 8 to 10 October 2024 Tribunal: C Sandelin (Deputy Chairperso

5. OIA-119742.pdf [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...separate occasions within a 12-month period.1 When does lawful protest action become unlawful behaviour? 9. The question of whether a particular protest is lawful will depend on the circumstances. 10. In Brooker v Police, the Supreme Court considered an appeal by a person who had been convicted of disorderly behaviour under the Summary Offences Act 1981 after publicly protesting in the street outside a police constable’s house. The majority found that:2 10.1. circumstances relevant to wh...

6. LCRO 86/2022 PR v KG and VW (12 November 2024) [pdf, 499 KB]

   ...add anything to the material and submissions made to the Standards Committee. Nature and scope of review [98] The High Court has described a review by this Office in the following way:42 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determination are entitled to a review based on the LCRO’s own opinion rather than on deference to the view of the Committee. A review by the LCRO is informal, inquisitorial and robust. It invo...

7. 20240930-Sentencing-Reform-Proactive-Release-2nd-Tranche_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 8.7 MB]

   ...available on the understanding that the plea will then be entered at the next opportunity. 5. Providing a discount for communicating a willingness to plead guilty is based on precedent in New Zealand and other jurisdictions. The New Zealand Court of Appeal included such a provision in the sliding scale laid out in R v Hessell [2009] NZCA 450. The England & Wales Sentencing Council guidelines state that where an offender is f,¾'. ~ 1:{ MINISTRY OF J ... ·.,···'· k ....

8. Ngāti Pāoa Whānau Trust v Hauraki Māori Trust Board (1995) 96A Hauraki MB 155 (96A H 155) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...He opined that representation should depend on: • a broad based consent of thepeople; • a dueprocess of consultation according to tikanga; and • credibility in termsof leadership. He also quoted Sir Graham Latimer in evidence to the Court of Appeal to say It would be unthinkable when dealing with a matter of great significance for the tribe to proceed without approval of rangatira and kaumatua who are acknowledged custodians of the authority of thetribe. These opinions greaUy helped...

9. Coroners-Court-Annual-Report-2023-WEB.pdf [pdf, 977 KB]

   Annual Report Te Kōti Kaitirotiro Matewhawhati o Aotearoa Coroners Court of New Zealand 2023/2024 He aha te mea nui o te ao? He tāngata, he tāngata, he tāngata. What is the most important thing in the world? It is people, it is people, it is people. Contents Foreword 5 Coroners Court Bench 8 Coroners and Associate Coroners – 30 June 2024 8 Coroners Court of New Zealand Te Kōti Kaitirotiro Matewhawhati Aotearoa 9 Judiciary of the Coroners Court

10. OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL NOE [pdf, 6.6 MB]

    ...desirability of preparing a regional plan when the implementation of a NPSFM arises, or is likely to arise. [99] It is also important to bear in mind that the Environment Court’s jurisdiction 20 is functionally limited. It is confined by the scope of appeals, and in turn further limited by the scope of submissions and further submissions. I agree with Mr Maassen’s submission that the Environment Court does not sit in an executive plan-making and plan-changing role. That is t...