Search Results

1. MLC 2019 January National Panui [pdf, 305 KB]

   Contents: Applications for hearing in JANUARY | KOHI-TÄTEA 2019: ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz JANUARY | KOHI-TÄTEA 2019 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confi rmed at the time of this publication are listed. For more i

2. Appendix-3_Logan-Brown_s87F-Report_Water-Quality-and-Aquatic-Ecology_28-April-2023.pdf [pdf, 886 KB]

   ...Stock water; (g) Existing infrastructure; (h) Capacity to assimilate pollution; and (i) Life supporting capacity – hill country mixed (Manakau, Ōhau), lowland mixed (Lake Horowhenua, Koputaroa). 29. In addition, the Natural Resources Plan (Appeal version 2022) contains reach and catchment specific values for Waitohu Stream and its tributaries. Schedule F values for the Waitohu catchment are: (a) Category 2 Surface waterbody; (b) Significant indigenous ecosystems - Habitat f...

3. Pomare v Pomare - Hongoeka 1B Parts and Hongoeka 1B1 (2024) 492 Aotea MB 5 (492 AOT 5) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   492 Aotea MB 5 Pōmare v Pōmare – Hongoeka 1B Parts and Hongoeka 1B1 (2024) 492 Aotea MB 5 (492 AOT 5) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District AP-20230000024751 A20180006200 WĀHANGA Under Sections 18, 215 and 328 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Hongoeka 1B Parts and Hongoeka 1B1 Block, Hongoeka 2A Section 1, Hongoeka 2B Section 1B, Hongoeka No.6 B,

4. 2021-03-12 ORC PC7 - Transcript - up to end of day 3 [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...desirability of preparing a regional plan when the implementation of a NPSFM arises, or is likely to arise. [99] It is also important to bear in mind that the Environment Court’s jurisdiction 20 is functionally limited. It is confined by the scope of appeals, and in turn further limited by the scope of submissions and further submissions. I agree with Mr Maassen’s submission that the Environment Court does not sit in an executive plan-making and plan-changing role. That is t...

5. Notification of Applications Over 6 months old that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) - 31 August 2019 [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 31 August 2019 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 31 August 2019, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Māori

6. Notification of Applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) - 31 May 2019 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...Winikerei Manukau - and succession orders made at 30 Mercer MB 141 (31 January 1947) - Application to the Chief Judge. 45/93 Louisana Pukuhuia Leaf-Hetaraka 1. Awaiting Administrative Action A20160004782 17/08/2016 S 98/93 - Special Aid - Waipapa 1D2B3B Appeal - (Leslie Erle Flight) J Koning 98(3)/93 John Koning 1. Awaiting Administrative Action A20160004868 22/08/2016 CJ 2016/27 - Titi Islands - Descendants of William Fisher and a succession order made at 20 South Island MB 160 on 11 December...

7. 2021-03-23 Transcript up to end of day 9 [pdf, 4.5 MB]

   ...desirability of preparing a regional plan when the implementation of a NPSFM arises, or is likely to arise. [99] It is also important to bear in mind that the Environment Court’s jurisdiction 20 is functionally limited. It is confined by the scope of appeals, and in turn further limited by the scope of submissions and further submissions. I agree with Mr Maassen’s submission that the Environment Court does not sit in an executive plan-making and plan-changing role. That is t...

8. [2024] NZEnvC 247 Allied Asphalt Limited [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...operative in 2004. The understanding of the complex issues involved was improved substantially by the collaborative efforts of six independent and highly qualified and experienced air quality experts assisting the Court during the hearing of the appeals.37 [70] The MMA was gazetted as a polluted airshed by the Minister for the Environment on 28 November 2019 because of exceedances of the PM10 threshold in the NESAQ. The MMA will remain a polluted airshed until the PM10 standard...

9. [2010] NZEmpC 72 Horton v Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...in Honda NZ Ltd v NZ (with exceptions) Shipwrights etc Union5. This too was a case where an employee was dismissed for unauthorised possession of company property, removing a can that contained thinners from Honda’s premises. The Court of Appeal upheld the Labour Court’s formulation of the standard of proof as follows: (i) A charge of the greatest gravity had been levelled against the worker and the burden of justifying the dismissal was, of course, on the respondent employe...

10. [2006] NZEmpC AC 63/06 Whelan v Attorney-General for CE of the Children and Young Persons Service [pdf, 112 KB]

    ...but reduced it for some mitigating factors relating to the counselling he had received to $45,000. In making that assessment I had regard to recent cases dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder or similar injuries. In Gilbert the Court of Appeal did not interfere with an award of $75,000 for general compensatory damages for distress. In Brickell v Attorney-General [2000] 2 ERNZ 529 the High Court awarded $75,000 and in Benge v Attorney-General [2000] 2 ERNZ 234 some four month...