Search Results

1. [2020] NZREADT 19 - Singh - costs (1 May 2020) [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...issued by Rosebank Road Medical Services Ltd (“Rosebank”), a company of which Mr Kodoor was half-owner, against his client Mr Govindarajan in the San Francisco Superior Court. Mr Govindarajan had been found not liable, but Rosebank had filed an appeal to the Californian Appeal Court. Mr Edmondson said that his request for a copy of the file was in order to “augment and/or review” the record for the purposes of oral argument on appeal. [8] The request was referred to coun...

2. B Ltd v N Ltd [2025] NZDT 170 (22 April 2025) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accepted...

3. Brunton v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 217 [pdf, 212 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 217 ACR 233/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN JULIE BRUNTON Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: The Appellant is self-represented I Hunt for the Corporation Judgment: 20 Decem...

4. [2018] NZEmpC 138 Samuels v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...costs based on the extent of a representative’s perceived professional obligations and financial overheads. [6] Mr Samuels was not a party to the original proceeding but that is not determinative. In Ye v Minister of Immigration the Court of Appeal emphasised that a generous approach to standing prevails, based on the constitutional principle that the courts must ensure that public bodies comply with the law.2 And in Re Erebus Royal Commission (No 2) harm to third party reputa...

5. Hill v Accident Compensation Corporation (Interest on weekly compensation) [2023] NZACC 216 [pdf, 212 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 216 ACR 1/22; ACR 218/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN PERCY HILL Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 13 December 2023 Held at: Auckland District Court Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented L Hawes-Gandar for the Accident...

6. [2024] NZEnvC 209 Bettley-Stamef Partnership v Waikato District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   Bettley-Stamef Partnership v Waikato District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 209 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN BETTLEY-STAMEF PARTNERSHIP (ENV-2022-AKL-018) Appellant AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent AND FANTESS LIMITED HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Section 274 parties Court: Environment J...

7. AR v Secretary of Justice 15 July 2013 NZRA 000004 [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...temporary approval to act for the appellant in an application to vacate pleas of guilty for a Criminal PC3 matter. The appellant had pleaded guilty to 10 charges while represented by another lawyer. He has asked the Applicant to act for him in his appeal against his conviction. 2. The Secretary for Justice (the Secretary) declined approval in a decision dated 30 May 2013. 3. The Secretary in reaching a decision to decline approval noted the following: a. The Applicant’s exp...

8. [2016] NZSSAA 046 (19 May 2016) [pdf, 27 KB]

   [2016] NZSSAA 046 Reference No. SSA 077/15 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Auckland against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member DECISION ON THE PAPERS Introduction [1] The appellant appeals against a decision of the Chief Executive upheld by a Benefits Review Committee to grant a Specia...

9. Lochiel Farmlands Limited 96 [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...7147 Wellesley Street Auckland Name of Person who wishes to be Party 1 LOCHIEL FARMLANDS LIMITED (LFL) wishes to be a party to the following proceedings: Clause 14(1) of First Schedule, RMA 1991, DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (DOC) appeal against part of the decision of Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 – Waikato and Waipa River Catchments to the Waikato Regional Plan as amended by Variation 1 (PC1). 2 LFL has made a submission about the subject ma...

10. [2019] NZEnvC 164 Echave v Thames-Coromandel District Council [pdf, 270 KB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 164 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act MANOLO ECHAVE (ENV-2018-AKL-000378) Appellant THAMES-COROMANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge M Harland sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Date of Decision: 3 October 2019 Date of Issue: 3 October 2019 DECISION OF THE ENVIRO...