Search Results

1. [2024] NZEnvC 230 Pan v Auckland Council [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge M J L Dickey Last case event: 9 September 2024 Date of Decision: 24 September 2024 Date of Issue: 24 September 2024 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: The applications for stay of the appeals are granted until 31 January 2025. B: The parties are to report to the Court on the status of the appeals by 24 January 2025. 2 REASONS Introduction [1] These appeals relate to abatement notices issued by the Auckland Ci...

2. Smith v ACC [2014] NZACA 6 [pdf, 31 KB]

   BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY AT WELLINGTON [2014] NZACA 6 NZACAA Decision No. 169/85 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an application for recall of judgment and rehearing pursuant to s 108(11) of the Act BETWEEN TREVOR SMITH Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent HEARING ON THE PAPERS AUTHORITY Robyn Bedford COUNSEL Mr Forster, advocate for appellan...

3. [2019] NZEnvC 001 Tauranga Environmental Protection Society Incorporated v Tauranga City Council [pdf, 180 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC C'O.!. of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under section 120 of the Act and an application for a declaration under s 311 of the Act TAURANGA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-AKL-000256 and ENV-2018-AKL-000384 ) Appellant and Applicant TAURANGA CITY COUNCIL BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Res...

4. LCRO 77/2018 CJ v VN (8 January 2019) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...Committee [X] (the Committee) to take no further action in respect of her complaint concerning conduct on the part of Mr VN. Background [2] Mr VN was appointed by the Legal Services Agency (LSA) to act on Ms CJ’s instructions on a criminal appeal after her ten-week trial. Ms CJ considers Mr VN did not spend enough time on her matter, failed to make it to a number of appointments he had made with her without a decent excuse and did a “very unprofessional job”. It appears Mr...

5. QC v-DH Ltd & DN & MS [2021] NZDT 1601 (24 June 2021) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

6. MR v BJ Ltd [2022] NZDT 17 (20 April 2022) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

7. FD v CE [2021] NZDT 1395 (22 April 2021) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

8. NQ v HN [2022] NZDT 38 (6 April 2022) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

9. DH v KQ [2021] NZDT 1654 (9 November 2021) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

10. SM v CT [2020] NZDT 1432 (4 August 2020) [pdf, 223 KB]

    ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...