Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 92 Kaipara v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...offered. The only question, therefore, is whether an offer made specifically for the purpose of settling litigation in the Authority and which was taken into account by it can, without more, be taken into account a second time on a challenge (appeal). [10] The Authority investigated Mr Kaipara’s grievances and determined that he had been disadvantaged and subsequently dismissed justifiably. 2 It reserved questions of costs and, after having received submissions from the parties...

2. Brooks v CAC 20002 & Anor [2013] NZREADT 112 [pdf, 138 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZREADT 112 READT 06/13 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN MURRAY BROOKS Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20002) First respondent AND MARIA STEPHENS Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Member Mr J Gaukrodger - Member BY CONSENT HEARD ON THE PAPERS DATE OF DECISIO...

3. Frankpitt v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal) [2022] NZACC 200 [pdf, 218 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 200 ACR 111/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN PETER DOUGLAS FRANKPITT Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Submissions: The Appellant is self-represented I Hunt for the Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment:...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 84 Robinson v Pacific Seals New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...opposition is that there was no identifiable miscarriage of justice and, even if there was, the 1 Robinson v Pacific Seals New Zealand Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 99. application is misconceived because an appeal is the appropriate vehicle for dealing with the applicant’s complaints. Background [3] It is not necessary to traverse the background to these proceedings in any detail. The applicant was seriously injured when a car drov...

5. Te Runanga o Ngati Hine v Te Runanga a iwi o Ngapuhi [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 89 (2013 APPEAL 89) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...A20110012598 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Determination of dispute between Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Hine and Te Rūnanga ā Iwi o Ngāpuhi – a decision made at 28 Taitokerau MB 217- 245 on 6 October 2011 - Appeal BETWEEN TE RŪNANGA O NGĀTI HINE Appellant AND TE RŪNANGA Ā IWI O NGĀPUHI First Respondent THE CROWN...

6. Kruger v Nikora - Tuhoe -Te Uru Taumatua [2021] Māori Appellate Court MB 444 (2021 APPEAL 444) [pdf, 296 KB]

   ...beneficiaries are Māori. Post-settlement governance entities are Māori trusts because all of their beneficiaries are Māori.6 Te hatepe o ngā pira nei Procedural history [7] There is a relatively lengthy procedural history in relation to these appeals that need not be traversed in detail here. It is sufficient to note that Mr Paki Nikora, on behalf of Te Kaunihera Kaumātua o Tūhoe (“TKKoT”), has applied to the Māori Land Court for various orders in relation to TUT...

7. Delamere v Jiang [2017] NZIACDT 1 (17 February 2017) [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...contacted Immigration New Zealand, but could not persuade them to alter the outcome. He took two formal steps: [3.1] Lodging a request under section 61 of the Immigration Act 2009 for the discretionary issue of a visa; and [3.2] Lodging an appeal on humanitarian grounds with the Immigration and Protection Tribunal. [4] Both actions failed. [5] Ms Wang filed a complaint against Mr Jiang, which the Registrar evaluated. She exercised her statutory powers to obtain Mr Jiang’s fi...

8. MK v Accident Compensation Corporation [2024] NZACC 45 (8 March 2024) [pdf, 460 KB]

   ...IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 045 ACR 166/23 ACR 167/23 ACR 168/23 ACR 235/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT BETWEEN MK Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 11 December 2023 Heard at: Hamilton / Kirikiriroa Appearances: HK lay advocat...

9. Mann v Accident Compensation Corporation (Jurisdiction, Social Rehabilitation, Costs on Review) [2023] NZACC 91 [pdf, 365 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 91 ACR 138/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN SHANE MANN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 1 June 2023 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikiriroa Appearances: K Koloni for Mr Mann F Becroft for the Accident Compensation Corporation Judgment...

10. [2019] NZEnvC 111 Tussock Rise Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 8.4 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 111 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to clause 14( 1) of the First Schedule of the Act TUSSOCK RISE LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-121) Appellant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J R Jackson ( sitting alone under section 279( 1) of the Act) Hearing: at Queenstown on 20 December 2018 (Final s...