Search Results

1. SC v U Ltd [2025] NZDT 38 (28 February 2025) [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accepted...

2. E v B & C LCRO 30 / 2009 (19 May 2009) [pdf, 16 KB]

   ...court. Complainant E, who had cross-examined the police sergeant, claimed that the sergeant gave sworn evidence was that the offence had occurred on 7 June. Complainant E was convicted of an offence that had occurred on 7 July 2006. Complainant E appealed the conviction. One ground of his appeal related to the evidence of the sergeant, which in his view rendered the conviction unsafe. This was rejected by the High Court, which upheld the original decision of the trial judge....

3. Salisbury v Hexham LCRO 25 / 2009 (12 May 2009) [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] The applicant, Mr Salisbury complained to the Law Society on 2 October 2008 in respect of the conduct of Mr Hexham concerning legal work he undertook in respect of a possible appeal of a criminal conviction. In particular he complained that the fees charged were excessive and that the matter was not handled properly by Mr Hexham. The Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee instructed a costs assessor and on...

4. Tioro v McCallum - Estate of Ngapiki Waaka Hakaraia [2017] Māori Appellate Court MB 427 (2017 APPEAL 427) [pdf, 208 KB]

   2017 Maori Appellate Court MB 427 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20170003321 APPEAL 2017/10 UNDER Section 58 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Estate of Ngapiki Waaka Hakaraia (also known as Hipera Ngapiki or Hipera Waaka or Ngapiki Hakaraia) BETWEEN JAMES TIORO Appellant AND CLARK JAMES McCALLUM First Respondent AND MĀORI TRUSTEE Second Respondent Hearing: 10 August...

5. READT Annual-Report 2017-18 [pdf, 343 KB]

   ...Disciplinary Tribunal (the Tribunal) was established in 2009 under the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. The Tribunal hears and determines charges against licensees laid by a complaints assessment committee of the Real Estate Agents Authority (the Authority), appeals against decisions made by a complaints assessment committee, and reviews of determinations on licensing applications made by the Registrar of the Authority. Membership The current membership of the Tribunal is:...

6. [2017] NZEmpC 94 Crimson Consulting Ltd v Berry [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...existed because the files of the Authority and the Court could not be searched without leave. [50] To resolve these issues, it is necessary to describe the conclusions reached in the H v A Ltd litigation, both in this Court and in the Court of Appeal, and also in several subsequent cases, not only in Erceg but in a number of other decisions, all of which I will endeavour to summarise as succinctly as possible. The Authority’s determination [51] Before doing so, I summarise w...

7. Chaudhary v Real Estate Agents Authority, Rajan & Devi [2018] NZREADT 2 [pdf, 213 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 2 READT 035/17 UNDER THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS ACT 2008 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 111 OF THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS ACT 2008 Between Akhil Chaudhary Appellant And Real Estate Agents Authority First Respondent And Subarmani Rajan and Sumintra Devi Second Respondent Tribunal: Ms K Davenport QC, Deputy Chair Ms N Dangen, Member Ms C Sandelin, Me...

8. [2022] NZEnvC 210 Aurora Energy Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 381 KB]

   ...ENERGY LTD & BALLANTYNE PROPERTIES LTD v QLDC PDP – Topic 36 IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 210 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN AURORA ENERGY LIMITED (ENV-2021-CHC-26) BALLANTYNE PROPERTIES LIMITED (ENV-2021-CHC-46) Appellants AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judg...

9. Mollett v Accident Compensation Corporation (Suspension of Weekly Entitlement and Delay) [2023] NZACC 112 [pdf, 263 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 112 ACR 298/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN NIKKI MOLLET Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 26 May and 10 July 2023 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikiriroa Appearances: K Koloni for the Appellant P McBride for the Respondent Judgment: 11 Jul...

10. [2024] NZEnvC 287 Port Taranaki Limited v New Plymouth District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    Port Taranaki Limited v New Plymouth District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 287 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN PORT TARANAKI LIMITED (ENV-2023-AKL-098) Appellant AND NEW PLYMOUTH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Last case ev...