Search Results

1. Jonas v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 412) and Hartnett [2019] NZREADT 002 [pdf, 326 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2019] NZREADT 002 READT 036/18 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN GRANT JONAS Applicant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 412) First respondent AND BRUCE HARTNETT Second respondent On the papers: Tribunal: Mr J Doogue, Deputy Chairperson Ms N Dangen, Member Ms N O’Connor, Member Submissions receiv...

2. [2019] NZSSAA 19 (1 April 2019) [pdf, 153 KB]

   [2019] NZSSAA 19 Reference No. SSAA 126/18 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 2018 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY S Pezaro - Deputy Chair K Williams - Member C Joe - Member Hearing at AUCKLAND on 11 March 2019 Appearances The appellant in person and Ivan Sowry, advocate R Stainthorpe, counsel, and N Jaura for the Ministry of S...

3. [2022] NZEnvC 008 Pyle v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 991 KB]

   ...only where it is serviced by on-site communal wastewater systems that can be retrofitted when public reticulated infrastructure is available. [13] The Council Decision on the Plan Change retained the RPZ zoning for the entire site. The Pyle’s appealed the Council Decision, seeking to rezone the site to GRZ with a precinct that enables “soft” engineering solutions including on-site wastewater and other mechanisms to achieve land and housing affordability. [14] The parties to...

4. Forms & fees

   ...& filing fees Paying court filing fees electronically Internet banking – identifying information Apply for help to pay the Environment Court fees Direct Referral cost recovery information The Environment Court charges a filing fee for lodging an appeal. The filing fee for each appeal/application type is listed with the appropriate section/form on this page. Environment Court prescribed forms & filing fees The court's forms are set out in the Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Proc...

   Located in:

   1. Environment Court

5. [2012] NZEmpC 92 Kaipara v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...offered. The only question, therefore, is whether an offer made specifically for the purpose of settling litigation in the Authority and which was taken into account by it can, without more, be taken into account a second time on a challenge (appeal). [10] The Authority investigated Mr Kaipara’s grievances and determined that he had been disadvantaged and subsequently dismissed justifiably. 2 It reserved questions of costs and, after having received submissions from the parties...

6. Brooks v CAC 20002 & Anor [2013] NZREADT 112 [pdf, 138 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZREADT 112 READT 06/13 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN MURRAY BROOKS Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20002) First respondent AND MARIA STEPHENS Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Member Mr J Gaukrodger - Member BY CONSENT HEARD ON THE PAPERS DATE OF DECISIO...

7. Frankpitt v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal) [2022] NZACC 200 [pdf, 218 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 200 ACR 111/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN PETER DOUGLAS FRANKPITT Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Submissions: The Appellant is self-represented I Hunt for the Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment:...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 84 Robinson v Pacific Seals New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...opposition is that there was no identifiable miscarriage of justice and, even if there was, the 1 Robinson v Pacific Seals New Zealand Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 99. application is misconceived because an appeal is the appropriate vehicle for dealing with the applicant’s complaints. Background [3] It is not necessary to traverse the background to these proceedings in any detail. The applicant was seriously injured when a car drov...

9. Te Runanga o Ngati Hine v Te Runanga a iwi o Ngapuhi [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 89 (2013 APPEAL 89) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...A20110012598 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Determination of dispute between Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Hine and Te Rūnanga ā Iwi o Ngāpuhi – a decision made at 28 Taitokerau MB 217- 245 on 6 October 2011 - Appeal BETWEEN TE RŪNANGA O NGĀTI HINE Appellant AND TE RŪNANGA Ā IWI O NGĀPUHI First Respondent THE CROWN...

10. Kruger v Nikora - Tuhoe -Te Uru Taumatua [2021] Māori Appellate Court MB 444 (2021 APPEAL 444) [pdf, 296 KB]

    ...beneficiaries are Māori. Post-settlement governance entities are Māori trusts because all of their beneficiaries are Māori.6 Te hatepe o ngā pira nei Procedural history [7] There is a relatively lengthy procedural history in relation to these appeals that need not be traversed in detail here. It is sufficient to note that Mr Paki Nikora, on behalf of Te Kaunihera Kaumātua o Tūhoe (“TKKoT”), has applied to the Māori Land Court for various orders in relation to TUT...