Search Results

1. BP v G Ltd [2023] NZDT 38 (20 January 2023) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the p...

2. EB v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 77 (21 February 2023) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the p...

3. KN v XD Inc [2024] NZDT 131 (4 March 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

4. NB & QD v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 722 (18 December 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

5. OL v CD Ltd [2023] NZDT 711 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

6. DQ v IC [2023] NZDT 710 (17 December 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

7. [2023] NZEnvC 241 Ngati Te Ata v Auckland Council [pdf, 178 KB]

   Ngāti Te Ata v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 241 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN NGĀTI TE ATA (ENV-2023-AKL-000032) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent AND GOLDING MEADOWS DEVELOPMENTS LTD & AUCKLAND TROTTING CLUB INC Private Plan Change Applicant AUCKLAND TRANSPORT NGĀTI T...

8. [2023] NZEnvC 213 Clutha District Council v Otago Regional Council [pdf, 219 KB]

   CLUTHA DISTRICT COUNCIL v OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL – STAY DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 213 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s325 of the Act BETWEEN CLUTHA DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2023-CHC-95) Appellant AND OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Sitting alone under s309(1) of the Act Hearing: In Chambers at Christch...

9. IN v BI [2023] NZDT 345 (18 July 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

10. EC & KC v CT & ZR [2022] NZDT 190 (17 October 2022) [pdf, 199 KB]

    ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...