Search Results

1. FN & NN v MO [2025] NZDT 259 (17 July 2025) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

2. BK & DT v P Ltd [2025] NZDT 265 (8 July 2025) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

3. SZ v DE & J Ltd [2025] NZDT 201 (07 May 2025) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

4. BO v T Ltd [2025] NZDT 208 (11 July 2025) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accepte...

5. DI v I Ltd [2025] NZDT 281 (10 July 2025) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

6. Mahoney v Trustees of the Nicholas George Te Paa Whanau Trust - Okahu 1 and other blocks [2015] Māori Appellate Court MB 417 (2015 APPEAL 417) [pdf, 198 KB]

   2015 Maori Appellate Court MB 417 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20150002503 APPEAL 2015/11 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Okahu 1, Okahu 3B2B2A, Okahu 3B2B2C, Okahu 3B2B2D, Okahu 4A, Okahu 4B, Okahu 4D, Okahu 4C1, Okahu 4C2, Okahu 3A and Okahu 3B2A BETWEEN DESMOND WILLIAM MAHONEY, TE URI REIHANA-NGATOTE & JOHN (HONE) PETERS Appellants AND TRUSTEES OF THE NICH...

7. [2017] NZEnvC 106 Wallace Group Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 445 KB]

   ...Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC \ 0 ro of Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 ("LGATPA") and the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") of an appeal under s156(3) LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel ("Hearings Panel") on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan ("Proposed Plan"...

8. [2019] NZREADT 45 Beatson - Ruling on Costs (26 November 2019) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...519) [21] The decision of the Tribunal in Kooiman9 concerned a complaint which was made against licensees of both unsatisfactory conduct and misconduct. The CAC determined that it would not enquire into the conduct of the licensees. Mr Kooiman appealed against that decision. The appeal failed. The licensees applied for costs. The decision of the High Court in Andrews was cited to the Tribunal. In effect, the Tribunal adopted part of the reasoning in Andrews. [22] In Kooiman the...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 202 Millar v Auckland Council [pdf, 507 KB]

   Millar & others v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 202 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 120 the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN GREGORY VICTOR MILLAR MARGARET MILLAR BRUCE SCOTT STEVENS TRUSTEE COMPANY LIMITED JIANWU AN KRISTIN ANNE BOWMAN MICHAEL ROBERT BOWMAN JANICE CATHERINE ULRICH (ENV-2023-AKL-000067) Appellants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL...

10. Nightingale v CAC10055 & Lee, Godfrey & Barfoot & Thompson Ltd [2012] NZREADT 55 [pdf, 67 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2012] NZREADT 55 READT 006/11 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN DONALD ROY NIGHTINGALE Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 10055) First Respondent AND HYE JUNG WON LEE (aka Julia Won), Kerry Godfrey and Barfoot & Thompson Ltd Second respondents BY CONSENT HEARD ON THE PAPERS MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barbe...