14344 items matching your search terms
...COURT AT AUCKLAND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND ENV-2016-AKL-000205 of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 ("LGATPA") and the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") of an appeal pursuant to section 156 of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel ("Panel") on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan ("Proposed Plan&q...
ROGER KEITH MILLER v DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL – 2GP Consent Order IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 98 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN R K MILLER (ENV-2018-CHC-236) Appellant AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge P A Steven – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch...
Waterfall Park Developments Ltd v QLDC – Consent Order IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 238 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals under s120 of the Act BETWEEN WATERFALL PARK DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (ENV-2023-CHC-9) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchur...
...• if not, what remedies are available to Mr Aberhart including whether he should be reinstated in employment as he seeks and, in particular, the level of compensation for non-economic loss in light of the judgment of the Court of Appeal in NCR (NZ) Corporation Ltd v Blowes [2005] 1 ERNZ 932. The Authority’s determination [2] It determined that SFL dismissed Mr Aberhart for genuine redundancy reasons but did so unfairly, causing the dismissal to have been unjustifie...
1 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT / I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA AT AUCKLAND UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 A N D IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act BETWEEN THE ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED (ENV – 2020 – AKL – 000094) Appellant WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF WAIRAKEI PASTORAL LIMITED’S WISH TO BE PARTY TO APPEA...
...jurisdictions, we’ve seen further significant improvements in reducing the average age of cases at the end of 2015, including: • Māori Land Court (down 35%) • Environment Court (down 22%) • Employment Court (down 30%) • High Court Civil Appeals (down 43%) • High Court bankruptcy applications (down 28%) • District Court Civil Originating Applications (down 41%). We’ve also launched a service allowing criminal defendants in a district court to get a text message remin...
HENARE V MAORI TRUSTEE MAC 2012 Maori Appellate Court MB 1 9 January 2012 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 2012 Maori Appellate Court MB 1 (2012 APPEAL 1) A20100004832 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Parengarenga 3G BETWEEN STEPHAN HENARE Appellant AND MAORI TRUSTEE Respondent AND KARAKA WIKI Second Respondent Hearing: 19 August 2010 (Heard at Whangarei) Court:...
...Introduction [1] By way of decision' dated 2 March 2017 the court granted consent to Filleul Apartments J V Limited to construct and use a non-complying apartment building at 97 Filleul Street, Dunedin. Costs were reserved. [2] Salis and Robertson appealed to the High Court and on 20 September 2017 a decision2 was issued dismissing that appeal. [3] The court has received two applications for costs against Salis and Robertson ("the appellants"); one on behalf of Fill...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 45 READT 052/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN JANE WANG and HUIBIN ZHOU Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 303) First respondent AND LUYING ZHAO Second Respondent Hearing: 2 June 2016 Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews (Chairperson) Mr J Gaukrodger (Member) Ms C Sandeli...
...statement of claim. [15] Very serious allegations of fraud or dishonesty have to be properly pleaded, and they have to be supported by credible evidence. These propositions are uncontroversial. They were conveniently summarised by the Court of Appeal in Schmidt v Pepper New Zealand (Custodians) Ltd, when it said:4 4 Schmidt v Pepper New Zealand (Custodians) Ltd [2012] NZCA 565, (emphasis added and footnotes omitted). [1...