Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 061 Hamilton Hayden Family Trust v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...THE HAMILTON HAYDEN FAMILY TRUST v QLDC – TOPIC 31 CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 61 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN DEAN HAMILTON, LISA HAYDEN AND MARK HORNABROOK AS TRUSTEES OF THE HAMILTON HAYDEN FAMILY TRUST (ENV-2019-CHC-33) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respo...

2. 2018 NZSSAA 007 (31 January 2018) [pdf, 241 KB]

   [2018] NZSSAA 007 Reference No. SSA 001/17 SSA 002/17 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX and XXXX of Invercargill against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Mr G Pearson - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Mr C Joe - Member Hearing at INVERCARGILL on 3 October 2017 Appearances The Appellant in person For Chief Executive of the Ministry...

3. Tatere v Te Aute Trust Board - Mangatainoka No 1BC No 2C, Tamaki 2A2A (Balance) [2016] Māori Appellate Court MB 329 (2016 APPEAL 329) [pdf, 238 KB]

   2016 Māori Appellate Court MB 329 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAKITIMU DISTRICT A20120007050 APPEAL 2012/4 UNDER Section 86, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal by Hohepa Mei Tatere and Te Aroha Edwards, against orders of the Māori Land Court made on 29 March 2012 at 15 Takitimu MB 4-14 and on 4 April 2012 at 15 Takitimu MB 203-221 in respect of Mangatainoka No 1BC No 2C, Tamaki 2A2A (Balance) also known as Ngawapur...

4. [2021] NZREADT 02 - Anonymised Appellant (18 January 2021) [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...ESTATE AGENTS ACT 2008, PUBLICATION OD THE NAMES OR ANY IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE APPELLANTS IS PROHIBITED BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 02 READT 016/20 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN [APPELLANT] Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1904) First Respondent AND PRUDENCE FOSTER and WINSTON KIDD Second Respondents...

5. [2021] NZEnvC 108 Manukorihi Tarau on behalf of Ngai Taiwhakaea v Whakatane District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI T AIAO KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Court: Hearing: Appearances: Decision [2021] NZEnvC I 0~ IN THE J\l1A TIER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 and in the matter of three appeals under s 120 of the Act BETWEEN J\11ANUKORIHI TARAU on behalf of NGAI TAIWHAKAEA AND AND (ENV-2021-AKL-029) TE RUNANGA O NGATI AWA (ENV-2021-AKL-030) CLETUS MAANU PAUL on behalf of OPIHI WHANAUNGAKORE TRUSTEES (ENV-2021-AKL-031) Appellants...

6. ENV-2016-AKL-000TBA Mahi Properties Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...Policies and Controls MAHI PROPERTIES LIMITED (Submitter No. 5476) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF APPEAL Dated 15 September 2016 To: The Registrar Environment Court Auckland 1. MAHI PROPERTIES LIMITED (Mahi Properties) appeals against a decision of the Auckland Council (the Council) on the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Proposed Plan). 2 2. It has the right to appeal the Council's decision under section 156(1) of the LGATPA because the Counci...

7. [2017] NZEnvC 118 Horowhenua DC v Manawatu Wanganui Regional Council [pdf, 187 KB]

   [BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 118 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act HOROWHENUA DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2016-WLG-000012) Appellant MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge B P Dwyer sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Hearing: In Chambers at Wellington Date of Decision: 9 August 2017 Date of Issue: 9 August 2017 COSTS DECISION OF T...

8. [2021] NZACC 48 - Phelps v ACC (15 March 2021) [pdf, 189 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 48 ACR 424/17 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT PURSUANT TO S 162 OF THE ACT BETWEEN KELLY PHELPS Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION BODY CORPORATE DULY CONSTITUTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE SAID ACT Respondent Hearing: On the papers Ju...

9. EFT v SQ [2019] NZDT 1357 (25 October 2019) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...

10. W v D [2019] NZDT 1362 (29 November 2019) [pdf, 220 KB]

    ...working days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceeding...