Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 066 Espin Holdings NZ Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 209 KB]

   ESPIN HOLDINGS NZ LIMITED V AUCKLAND COUNCIL – S116 IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 066 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN ESPIN HOLDINGS NZ LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-000023) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge M J L Dickey sitting alone under s 116 and s 279 of the Act Hearing: On the papers...

2. [2022] NZACC 103 - Renton v ACC (31 May 2022) [pdf, 259 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 103 ACR 297/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN NIGEL RENTON Appellant AND THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: A Beck for the Appellant I Hunt for the Respondent Judgment: 31 May 2022 DECISION OF JUDGE P R S...

3. Hunter v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to Appeal to High Court) [2025] NZACC 97 (13 June 2025) [pdf, 170 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZACC 097 ACAR 36/25 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN LEIGH HUNTER Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the Papers Appearances: The Applicant is self-represented H.H. Ifwersen and Reuben Hindriksen for the Respondent Judgment: 13 June 20...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 186 Blue Wallace Surveyors Limited v Waikato District Council [pdf, 422 KB]

   Perjuli & Blue Wallace v Waikato District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 186 IN THE MATTER OF two appeals under cl 14 of Schedule 1 to the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN BLUE WALLACE SURVEYORS LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-045) PERJULI DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-053) Appellants AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Chief Environment Court Judge D A Kirkpatrick...

5. [2022] NZACC 198 – Roberts v ACC (11 October 2022) [pdf, 159 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 198 ACR 266/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN JASON ROBERTS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Judgment on the papers. Submissions: C Leaf for the Appellant P McBride for the Respondent Date of Judgment: 11 October 2022 JUDGMENT O...

6. Bahramitash v CAC 402 & Ritesh [2016] NZREADT 40 [pdf, 176 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 40 READT 070/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN PARSOA (SHAUN) BAHRAMITASH Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 402) First respondent AND RAJA RITHESH Second respondent Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews Chairperson Garry Denley Member Catherine Sandelin Member Hearing: On the papers by...

7. Hawke v ACC [2012] NZACA 10 [pdf, 375 KB]

   IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN [2012] NZACA 10 ACA 7/12 of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 of an appeal pursuant to s 107 of the Act DIANE HAWKE of Auckland Appellant . ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION a body corporate duly constituted under the provisions of the said Act Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY R Bedford HEARING at Auckland on 26 June 2012 APPEARANCES/COUNSEL Mr Peart for appellant Ms Becroft (in person) an...

8. Mr E v REAA & Mr N [2013] NZREADT 27 [pdf, 39 KB]

   ...of a civil dispute between the parties. The Committee also found that the explanation provided by Mr N was a plausible explanation for the steps that he had taken during his time at X X Limited. They resolved not to prosecute Mr N. [4] Mr E has appealed this decision. The grounds of Mr E’s appeal are: [a] That the Committee ought to have exercised its discretion pursuant to s.89(2) to determine that the complaint be considered by the Disciplinary Tribunal. [b] The second re...

9. BM v YI LCRO 124 / 2010 (7 April 2011) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...that evidence was not put before the Court. [3] In 2007, Mr S, a barrister, was retained by the Legal Services Agency (LSA) for an opinion as to whether legal aid should be granted to enable the Applicant to pursue an application for leave to appeal. Following receipt of that opinion, legal aid was granted. Subsequently, the Court made an order granting the Applicant leave to appeal. [4] The Respondent agreed to conduct the appeal on a pro bono basis. He determined that the g...

10. [2022] NZACC 57 - McCarthy v ACC (5 April 2022) [pdf, 164 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 57 ACR 053/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN KINCAID MCCARTHY Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Judgment on the papers. Submissions: F Taylor for the Appellant S Hack for the Respondent Date of Judgment: 5 April 2022 JUDGMENT OF JU...