Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 153 Selwyn Quarries Limited v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 4.7 MB]

   ...dated 17 May 2019. [1 0] We have read all of the documentation filed , although we found that its relevance, in terms of the orders sought, was not always clear. [11] That said, we commence with the notice of appeal. Notice of appeal [12] SQL appealed against a decision of the Canterbury Regional Council to decline an application for resource consents required to deepen and backfill part of an existing quarry located at 48 Selwyn Rd, Selwyn District.12 The application is to cons...

2. Davies v Trustees of Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 Ahu Whenua Trust - Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 Trust [2016] Māori Appellate Court 179 (2016 APPEAL 179) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...would enable us to assess the relevance of those costs to these proceedings. [17] Furthermore any issue of costs in the lower court hearing is a matter appropriate for the lower court to determine. We also understand that our decision is to be appealed to the Court of Appeal. When and if the lower court rehears the matter, and if the appellants are successful, they will have an opportunity to apply for costs to the lower court then. Emotional and/or mental harm [18] Mr Hetaraka s...

3. Erlbeck v Goldsmith - Marangairoa C12 [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 340 (2011 APPEAL 340) [pdf, 122 KB]

   ERLBECK V GOLDSMITH MAC 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 340 9 August 2011 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRICT 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 340 (2011 APPEAL 340) A20110004247 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Marangairoa C12 BETWEEN HANA HIRAINA ERLBECK AND HINGATU TE MATE OHORERE HAM Appellants AND ETHIEL LAVINIA GOLDSMITH Respondent Hearing: 9 August 2011 (Heard at Gisborne)...

4. ENV-2016-AKL-000TBA Vector Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 381 KB]

   ...Vector addressed in its submission on the Unitary Plan (submitter 2745 / further submitter 2881). The Council decided on an alternative solution, which resulted in a matter being included in the Unitary Plan. Parts of the Decision that Vector is appealing 5. Vector appeals that part of the Decision relating to the permitted activity standards in E26.2.5.1 (4) for the construction of electric vehicle charging stations within roads and unformed roads. Reasons for appeal 6. The C...

5. Hamilton-Tuahu3X (2009) 34 Gisborne MB 230 (34 APGS 230) [pdf, 55 KB]

   ...A20090010024 12 November 2009 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRICT 34 GISBORNE APPELLATE MINUTE BOOK 230 A20090010024 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Tuahu 3X (Erepeti Marae) Appeal HIRO HARE HAMILTON Appellant Coram: Judge S Clark Judge P Savage Judge D Ambler Hearing: 12 November 2009 (Heard at Gisborne) Appearances: B Tupara for H Hamilton P Harman for Erepeti Marae Trustees Judg...

6. KD v NI Ltd [2019] NZDT 1361 (29 November 2019) [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...

7. K&B Partnership v JC [2016] NZDT 1345 (14 April 2016) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...

8. [2024] NZEnvC 186 Blake v Auckland Council [pdf, 484 KB]

   Blake v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 186 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 120 the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN MAGGIE BLAKE (ENV-2024-AKL-000057) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge M J L Dickey sitting alone under s 279(1)(b) of the Act Last case event: 17 July 2024 Date of Order: 6 August 2024 Date of Iss...

9. [2023] NZCAA 01 (20 July 2023) [pdf, 189 KB]

   Representatives: Colin Mitchell, Barrister, Auckland, for the Appellants New Zealand Customs Service, Auckland, for Customs BEFORE THE CUSTOMS APPEAL AUTHORITY Decision: [2023] NZCAA 01 UNDER The Customs and Excise Act 2018 BETWEEN XXXX and YYYY Appellants AND Chief Executive of the New Zealand Customs Service Respondent Hearing: On the papers Counsel: Mr C Mitchell, counsel for the Appellants. Ms N Taylor and Ms O Nor...

10. [2023] NZEnvC 133 Bay of Islands Maritime Park Incorporated v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

    pNRP – Topic 1B – Vehicles on beaches IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 133 IN THE MATTER OF appeals under clause 14 of the Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN BAY OF ISLANDS MARITIME PARK INCORPORATED (ENV-2019-AKL-000117) CEP SERVICES MATAUWHI LIMITED (ENV-2019-AKL-000111) D LOURIE (ENV-2019-AKL-000128) ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPO...