Mr E v REAA & Mr N [2013] NZREADT 27 [pdf, 39 KB]
...of a civil dispute between the parties. The Committee also found that the explanation provided by Mr N was a plausible explanation for the steps that he had taken during his time at X X Limited. They resolved not to prosecute Mr N. [4] Mr E has appealed this decision. The grounds of Mr E’s appeal are: [a] That the Committee ought to have exercised its discretion pursuant to s.89(2) to determine that the complaint be considered by the Disciplinary Tribunal. [b] The second re...