Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 117 Orakei Point Trustee Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...make the policy statement or plan inconsistent with Part 5; or (e) in the case of a proposed change to a policy statement or plan , the policy statement or plan has been operative for less than 2 years. [1 O] The Council's decision can be appealed to this Court in accordance with clause 27 of the First Schedule to the Act. 27 Appeals (1) A person who requests a plan change under clause 21 may appeal to the Environment Court against a decision referred to in subclause (1A) with...

2. [2020] NZSSAA 17 (7 October 2020) [pdf, 128 KB]

   [2020] NZSSAA 17 Reference No. SSA 101/19 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 2018 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Whangarei against a decision of the Chief Executive that has been confirmed or varied by a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY S Pezaro - Deputy Chair C Joe - Member DECISION ON THE PAPERS Background [1] XXXX (“the appellant”) appeals the decision on 4 June 2019 to decline an applicati...

3. WHT Annual Report 2021 [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...of the District Court.7 The claims brought before the Tribunal range in value from about $50,000 to the low tens of millions. They concern stand-alone houses, townhouses and apartments. The Tribunal resolves cases throughout New Zealand. Appeals A party to a claim determined by the Tribunal may appeal on a question of law or fact arising out of the decision.8 The appeal will be heard by the District Court if the amount does not exceed $350,000, otherwise it will be heard by t...

4. WHT Annual Report 2022 [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...of the District Court.7 The claims brought before the Tribunal range in value from about $50,000 to the low tens of millions. They concern stand-alone houses, townhouses and apartments. The Tribunal resolves cases throughout New Zealand. Appeals A party to a claim determined by the Tribunal may appeal on a question of law or fact arising out of the decision.8 The appeal will be heard by the District Court if the amount does not exceed $350,000, otherwise it will be heard by t...

5. TG v E Ltd [2024] NZDT 289 (10 May 2024) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...there are two applicants by way of claim and counterclaim. 3. The parties relied on the written submissions and evidence they both filed pursuant to the District Court Judges decision/timetabling orders, who granted the applicant’s successful appeal of the Tribunals original decision. I have carefully considered that documentation and what was said by the parties at the number of hearings before me (including audio recordings of meetings toward the end of the works). 4. This clai...

6. [2024] NZEnvC 265 Transpower New Zealand Limited v Waikato District Council [pdf, 221 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 265 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 to the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) BETWEEN TRANSPOWER NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-074) Appellant AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent AND KĀINGA ORA – HOMES AND COMMUNITIES FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND Section 274 Interested Parties Court: Environment Judge S M Tepa...

7. LT v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 690 (13 November 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...parked for 7 minutes beyond the 180 minute parking limit at a private carpark on [Street]. 2. LT’s daughter was parked there while she used the gym services of one of the customer businesses for whom B Ltd provides parking enforcement. 3. LT appealed the notice on the basis that the amount of the breach was so short, her daughter was a loyal customer of a relevant business and the time stamp data collected by B Ltd is on the entry and exit ramp, so measures the total time in the...

8. LH v NT LCRO 86/2015 (20 April 2016) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...[9] On 23 September 2013 the Weathertight Homes Tribunal (WHT) issued an order removing Mr MD and Ms QV as parties to the proceeding on the basis that there was no tenable claim against them. On instructions from Mr and Mrs LH, Mr NT lodged an appeal against that order in the High Court. Due to the novelty of the grounds of appeal, and there being no right of appeal from the High Court, the Court transferred the proceedings to the Court of Appeal. [10] Mr LH subsequently obtained...

9. AR v VE LCRO 334/2012 (10 August 2015) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...compromise proposal to his creditors. [7] During the course of applying for the adjournment, Mr VE “signalled [to the Judge] that in the event of adjudication [by the Judge] [the debtor] would seek a stay in order that [the debtor] could pursue an appeal”.5 [8] The Judge dealing with the proceedings refused to grant an adjournment and adjudicated Mr VE’s client bankrupt. She did however grant an interim stay as sought by Mr VE.6 Complaint and response [9] The complaint...

10. Workman v CAC 402 & Keely [2016] NZREADT 61 [pdf, 153 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 61 READT 062/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN MACK WORKMAN Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 402) First respondent AND DEBORAH KEELY AND LESLIE KEELY Second Respondents Hearing: 26 July 2016, at Auckland Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Ms N Dangen, Member Mr G Den...