Search Results

1. Koia - Wharekahika A13 - Potaka Marae (2006) 75 Ruatoria MB 155 (75 RUA 155) [pdf, 703 KB]

   ...decision and asking me to reconsider. The Registrar refused to accept the memorandum on the basis that it was not in proper form, and that if Mr Koia wished to challenge my decision he would need to do so by way of an application for re­ hearing or by appeal. Mr Koia then applied on 8 August 2006 for directions of the Court that the Registrar had no power to refuse to file the July memorandum and that the Registrar's action in doing so contravened the provisions of the Act and th...

2. Stone v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 408) & Lim [2017] NZREADT 23 [pdf, 218 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2017] NZREADT 23 READT 039/16 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN GARY STONE Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 408) First Respondent AND SUSAN LIM Second Respondent (Not participating in the appeal) Hearing: 22 March 2017, at Auckland Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Mr G Denley,...

3. [2019] NZEnvC 057 Auckland Shooting Club Inc v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.1 MB]

   ...May 2018. The stay order was made at that time on the basis there was a dispute as to the relevance of the abatement notice issued against the Auckland Shooting Club. There were proceedings for judicial review in the High Court and that had been appealed to the Court of Appeal at that time. 3. Part of the stay application relied on impending special events originated by the shooting club. The court appears to have granted an interim stay in contemplation that it was for a relative...

4. Ratana v Tihi - Ruatoki B Section 23 and others [2021] Maori Appellate Court MB 290 (2021 APPEAL 290) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...house. That issue has been circling through the Māori Land Court, and this Court, for the last six years. [3] The Māori Land Court first determined ownership of the house in 2017.1 It then amended that order in 2018.2 The amended order was appealed to this Court. In 2019, this Court upheld the appeal, quashed the amended order and sent it back to the Māori Land Court for rehearing.3 [4] In 2020, Judge Coxhead conducted that rehearing. He found that:4 (a) The house is a...

5. [2022] NZACC 184 — Simpson v ACC (27 September 2022) [pdf, 233 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 184 ACR 70/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN ALBERT SIMPSON Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: B Hinchcliff for Mr Simpson L Mailand for the Respondent Judgment: 27 September...

6. [2023] NZEnvC 035 Aokautere Land Holdings Limited v Palmerston North City Council [pdf, 367 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA IN THE l\tIA TTER OF BETWEEN AND Decision No. (2023] NZEnvC 035 an appeal under s 17 4 of the Resource Management Act 1991 AOKAUTERE LAND HOLDINGS LIMITED (ENV--2021-WLG-000026) Appellant PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge BP Dwyer sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Hearing: via A VL on 1 September 2022 Appearances: G Woollaston & J Ric...

7. [2021] NZACC 92 - Cowan v ACC [pdf, 173 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 92 ACR 21/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT ON A QUESTION OF LAW UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE ACT BETWEEN MARIO COWAN Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the Papers Judgment: 29 June 2021 _____________________________________...

8. LCRO 98/2022 DC v HT (20 December 2024) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...because DC considers that he was wrongly convicted and that a key reason for this was the way in which his defence was conducted by UB. [6] HT does appear to have advised DC about sentencing options after the defended hearing. [7] I note that DC appealed his convictions and the sentences imposed, to the High Court. The appeal was heard by Judge A on 2 September 2022. PS, barrister, appeared on behalf of DC to argue the appeal. [8] In her report to DC following the appeal hearing, PS...

9. IE v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 587 (12 August 2024) [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...by X Ltd, there is no basis for recovering it from X Ltd. (d) IE did not participate in the Family Court proceedings. He attributed his non-attendance to errors in the [Court] process. However, both the High Court and a subsequent Court of Appeal decision confirmed that IE “did have notice of the hearing on 18 February” and that “IE’s fair hearing rights had not been breached”. It is not clear what different outcome might have been achieved had IE attended. However, a...

10. Defending a proceeding in the High Court

    ...This section outlines how you can defend the following types of proceeding in the High Court: Defending a general civil proceeding - someone wants to recover money or settle a dispute Defending an originating application Defending a civil appeal - someone has asked a senior court to reconsider a judge's decision Defending a bankruptcy notice - someone has applied to have you declared insolvent or unable to pay your debts Defending a creditor’s application for adjudication...

    Located in:

    1. Courts >
    2. Going to court >
    3. Going to court without a lawyer >
    4. Representing yourself in a civil case in the High Court