Search Results

1. Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill Exposure Draft for Referendum [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...Subpart 5—Adverse decisions 116 Adverse decisions 63 117 Internal review of decision of Authority 63 118 Notice of decision on internal review 64 119 Effect of notice of decision 64 120 Stay of reviewable decision on internal review 64 Subpart 6—Appeals 121 Cannabis Appeals Authority 65 122 Who may appeal 65 123 Appeals by way of rehearing 65 124 Determination of appeal 66 125 Effect of appeal 66 126 Prohibition on inclusion of false information in licence application 66 127 Knowingly appl...

2. [2015] NZEmpC 219 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...AFFCO to substantiate its allegation by evidence that can be tested in court. Until that is established, therefore, AFFCO’s allegation remains just that. In any event, judgments of this Court now record the position, subject of course to any appeals. An appeal? [29] Counsel advise, not surprisingly, that AFFCO has sought the leave of the Court of Appeal to appeal against the full Court’s judgment and has sought both urgency for the hearing of that application for...

3. Kozlov v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 416) and Hall & Lindsay [2018] NZREADT 38 [pdf, 241 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 38 READT 008/18 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN ANDREI ALEKSANDROVICH KOZLOV Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 416) First Respondent AND SUSAN HALL & RICHARD LINDSAY Second Respondent On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Ms C Sandelin, Member Mr N...

4. [2021] NZREADT 14 - Ogilvie v The Real Estate Agents Authority & Abel (6 April 2021) [pdf, 221 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 14 READT 030/20 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN RUTH OGILVIE Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1901) First Respondent AND KEIGHLY ABEL Second Respondent Hearing: 10 March 2021, at Napier Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Ms C Sandelin, Member Mr N O’Connor, Me...

5. Welsh — Part Awarua Block (2009) 7 Taitokerau Appellate MB 122 (7 APWH 122) [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...Ambler ordered that Part Awarua Block 7 Taitokerau Appellate MB 123 (“the school site”), be vested in the former owners and also declared that the land shall become Māori freehold land (123 Whangarei MB 17). [2] Mr Stanley Welsh appeals that decision and argues that the school site should have been vested solely in Maraina Wi Mura. Background [3] On 26 May 1915 the Native Land Court investigated customary land known as Awarua. On 26 May 1915 the Court issued a f...

6. [2020] NZEnvC 123 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl OTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 123 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act UPPER CLUTHA ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-056) DARBY PLANNING LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-150) Appellants QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Sitti...

7. [2021] NZEnvC 072 Moreton v Gisborne District Council [pdf, 922 KB]

   ...Application for waiver or directions at page 4. 3 [8] Pursuant to s 37 of the Act, the Hearing Commissioner declined to grant a waiver to Mr Moreton for the late filing of his submission. Court directions/ Mr Moreton's position [9] While an appeal against the Council's decision on the waiver was not filed, the nature of the direction sought by Mr Moreton required the Court to overturn the Council's decision. The Court advised Mr Moreton that it was not prepared to...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 206 The Chief of New Zealand Defence Force v Darnley [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...decreased as appropriate.6 Mixed measures of success [7] The submissions of the parties also gave rise to the issue of whether costs should lie where they fall where there is a mixed measure of success. In Health Waikato Ltd v Elmsly, the Court of Appeal noted that costs usually follow the event and that in most cases it is clear who has been successful and thus prima facie entitled to an award.7 However, the Court also held: [35] Costs usually follow the event. In most cases...

9. [2022] NZEmpC 204 The Chief of New Zealand Defence Force v Darnley [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...decreased as appropriate.6 Mixed measures of success [7] The submissions of the parties also gave rise to the issue of whether costs should lie where they fall where there is a mixed measure of success. In Health Waikato Ltd v Elmsly, the Court of Appeal noted that costs usually follow the event and that in most cases it is clear who has been successful and thus prima facie entitled to an award.7 However, the Court also held: [35] Costs usually follow the event. In most cases...

10. [2015] NZSSAA 030, 4 May [pdf, 47 KB]

    [2015] NZSSAA 030 Reference No. SSA 001/15 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace − Chairperson Mr K Williams − Member Lady Tureiti Moxon − Member HEARING at DUNEDIN on 15 April 2015 APPEARANCES The appellant in person Mr G Moore for Chief Executive of the Ministry of S...