Search Results

1. Steinbauer v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal) [2022] NZACC 238 [pdf, 151 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 238 ACR 209/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN M STEINBAUER Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Judgment on the papers. Submissions: The Appellant is self-represented J Sumner for the Respondent Date of Judgment: 7 December 2022 JU...

2. [2022] NZACC 91 – Burrow v ACC (14 March 2022) [pdf, 138 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 91 ACR 022/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN KARIMER LE FLEMING BURROW Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 14 March 2022 DECISION OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Leave to appeal out of time] Introduction [1]...

3. [2020] NZREADT 15 - Motupally - Interim Decision (12 May 2020) [pdf, 259 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZREADT 15 READT 038/19 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN PRASHANTH KUMAR MOTUPALLY Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1903) First respondent AND JAYSON HAYDE & DAVID WELLS Second Respondents Tribunal: Mr J Doogue, Deputy Chairperson Ms C Sandelin, Member Mr N O’Connor, Member...

4. [2025] NZSSAA 04 (28 January 2025) [pdf, 69 KB]

   SSAA 05/25 [2025] NZSSAA 04 UNDER the Social Security Act 2018 IN THE MATTER of a late appeal by XXXX, of Whangaparaoa against a decision of the Chief Executive that has been confirmed or varied by a Benefits Review Committee. DECISION Background [1] XXXX wishes to appeal against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee dated 24 January 2023. [2] The proposed appeal concerns the Ministry’s decision to decline XXXX’s application to...

5. [2020] NZEnvC 207 Tussock Rise Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl OTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 207 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act TUSSOCK RISE LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-121) Appellant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Sitting alone pursuant to s279 of the Act Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch D...

6. Soulsby v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 102 (18 June 2024) [pdf, 226 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 102 ACAR 82/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN ANDRE SOULSBY Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Submissions: J Robinson for applicant F Becroft for respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 18 June 2024 JUDGMENT OF JUD...

7. Pace v Cain - Parish of Manurewa 196 and 197A Section 2B 4 [2017] Māori Appellate Court MB 342 (2017 APPEAL 342) [pdf, 297 KB]

   2017 Māori Appellate Court MB 342 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20170005075 APPEAL 2017/14 UNDER Section 58 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Parish of Manurewa 196 and 197A Section 2B 4 BETWEEN JUSTIN JAMES PACE Appellant JODI CAIN Respondent Hearing: On the papers Court: Judge L R Harvey (Presiding) Judge C T Coxhead Judge S F Reeves Judgment: 12 Oct...

8. [2017] NZEnvC 004 Tram Lease Limited v New Zealand Transport Agency [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 4 of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) of appeals under section 157 of the LGATPA against decisions of requiring authorities or the Auckland Council in relation to the designations or heritage orders included in the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP) of an Application fo...

9. LCRO 1/2021 NB v GP (31 May 2022) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...of the respondent, Mr GP. Background [2] Mr NB was in dispute with the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC). [3] ACC had declined to provide funding for elective surgery that Mr NB wished to have performed. [4] Mr NB instructed Mr GP to appeal ACC’s decision in the District Court. 2 [5] A hearing proceeded in May 2019. In a decision issued on 5 June 2019, the Court dismissed Mr NB’s appeal. The judge determined that whilst Mr NB had suffered an injury in 1981, the...

10. Appellate judgments 2017

    ...right not to be discriminated against is a legislative requirement not necessarily linked to an employment agreement – Employment Court was correct to find that employees that work in New Zealand are covered by protection against age discrimination – appeal allowed – MAJORITY JUDGMENT – employment law issui generis in nature so party choice of law is not relevant – employees worked in New Zealand – Employment Court was correct to find that employees were covered by protection agains...

    Located in:

    1. Employment Court >
    2. Judgments >
    3. Appellate court judgments