14960 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2025] NZREADT 23 Reference No: READT 035/2024 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN NW Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2204) First Respondent AND OE Second Respondent AND ST Third Respondent AND GI Fourth Respondent Hearing on the papers Tribunal: C Sandelin (Deputy Chair) G Denley (Member) F Mathi...
...s.89(2)(c) of the Act (to take no further action) given that the Committee enquired into the complaint and made an assessment of the sufficiency of the evidence for a finding of unsatisfactory conduct. [19] We have previously held that general appeals from factual determinations will be subject to a wider approach on appeal than appeals from discretionary decisions. That approach is consistent with principles articulated by the Supreme Court in Kacem v Bashir [2010] NZFLR 884: “...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2019] NZREADT 11 READT 048/18 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN MICHAEL EDWIN KOOIMAN Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 519) First respondent AND MURRAY RODGERS, MATTHEW CLARKE, and PAUL CUDBY Second, third, and fourth respondents Hearing: 14 March 2019, at Wellington Tribunal: Hon P J...
...10 appeal. In situations where an application has been approved, but the Director of Mental Health disagrees with the decision, the Director of Mental Health may lodge an appeal. 36. We consider that the Family Court is well-placed to consider appeals on matters relating to special patients as it already has a role in making compulsory treatment and care orders under the Mental Health Act and the Intellectual Disability Act. 37. Appeals of Special Patient Review Tribunal decisions wo...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZREADT 20 READT 041/13 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN WARATAH TRUST LTD Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20004) First respondent AND JEREMY PRYOR Second respondent AND SUCCESS REALTY LTD Third respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Member Mr J Gaukrodger - Member...
...representation at the PAL 3 level. One of the two SCs who considered the Applicant’s applications was critical of his examples of cross-examination, particularly in “case G”. In addition, Mr Hurd produced a copy of a decision of the Court of Appeal, in a case where the Applicant had appeared for the appellant at trial. The appellant’s conviction at trial was quashed by the Court of Appeal, on the basis that his decision not to give evidence had not been sufficiently infor...
...proceedings which had been in train since 2013 and had the Court been made aware of Judge Savage decision of 13 August 2015, the Māori Appellate Court application dated 13 October 2015, the hearing of 10 December 2015 and the substantive appeal of 17 February 2016 and the fact that the Māori Appellate Court had reserved its decision which finally issued on 29 June 2016, all of this information should have been put before me when I heard the matter on 22 June 2016 and it would...
...Appeal setting tariffs for certain types of offending. 13. From the starting point, aggravating and mitigating factors were taken into consideration to arrive at a sentence applicable to the offending in the particular case. Sentences were sometimes appealed on the ground that the sentence was ‘manifestly unjust’. In deciding whether to allow such an appeal the court would consider whether the sentencing judge was ‘plainly wrong’ in arriving at the sentence. In some cases minor adjust...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2022] NZREADT 7 Reference No: READT 003/2021 & 004/2021 IN THE MATTER OF Appeals under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 READT 003/2021 BETWEEN WM and NU Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1906) First Respondent AND BENJAMIN CARTWRIGHT Second Respondent READT 004/2021 AND BETWEEN BENJAMIN CARTWRIGHT Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 166 ACR 124/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN SOUTHERN TRANSPORT COMPANY LIMITED Applicant AND NICOLA EMTAGE First Respondent AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Second Respondent Submissions: N McAllister for the Applicant P O’Sullivan for the Fi...