14337 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZREADT 62 READT 101/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN CHRISTINE RATAHI Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 301) First respondent AND LYNNE AND GARY LEGGE Second respondents READT 103/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN LYNNE AND GARY LEGGE Appellants R...
RUDOLPH V RETI MAC 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 143 5 April 2011 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 143 (2011 APPEAL 143) A20100005368 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal against an order of the Maori Land Court made on 21 January 2010 at 1 Taitokerau MB 4-5 in respect of Otetao B3A2 BETWEEN MAE OR MEI RUDOLPH OR MAMAEROA RUDOLPH JNR ON BEHALF OF TE...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC c9.\ of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act TE TUMU KAITUNA 14 TRUST (ENV-2017 -AKL-000145) Appellant TAURANGA CITY COUNCIL Respondent BLUEHAVEN HOLDINGS LIMITED S274 Party Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick sitting alone under s279(1 )(c) and (e) of the Act Date of Decision: 22...
...rehearing of the variation proceedings, on 29 March 2012, Deputy Chief Judge Isaac (as he then was) declined to vary the date of distribution.3 [3] Both the decision to remove the trustees and the decision to decline the variation application were appealed. On 8 March 2013, the Māori Appellate Court dismissed the appeal against the trustees’ removal and, on 14 June 2013, the appeal against the variation application was allowed and orders were made giving effect to the variatio...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2024] NZREADT 31 Reference No: READT 021/2023 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN HH Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2201) First Respondent AND SL Second Respondent Tribunal: D J Plunkett (Chair) P N O’Connor (Member) F J Mathieson (Member) Representation Counsel for the appellant: KH Counsel for...
...consistent with the principles of the Act and the scheme under it for determining personal grievances. [9] Mr Drake spent more time on the third question. Mr Hall seeks exemplary damages. Mr Drake conceded that there are authorities of the Court of Appeal, notably Paper Reclaim Ltd v Aotearoa International Ltd 3 and the decision of this Court in Prins v Tirohanga Group Ltd 4 which held that the remedy of exemplary damages is not available in respect of a contractual breach inc...
Decision No: [2013] NZREADT 111 Reference No: READT 069/12 & READT 070/12 IN THE MATTER OF appeals under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN MR K Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20002) First respondent AND MR N Second respondent AND BETWEEN MR N Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20002) First respondent AND MR K Second respond...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2017] NZREADT 14 READT 064/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN RUSSELL MARTIN Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 407) First Respondent AND NATHAN TAMIHANA Second Respondent AND GOLD REAL ESTATE GROUP LIMITED Third Respondent On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Cha...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2017] NZREADT 32 IN THE MATTER OF Appeals under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 READT 033/16 BETWEEN BRENT PIPER Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 408) First Respondent AND STEPHEN HOTCHIN and VALERIE HOTCHIN-DAVIES Second Respondents READT 037/16 BETWEEN ANTHONY EBERT Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 408)...
..."Crown Law Numbers", actual figures up to and including March 2017 have been added to the Crown Law data table. Crown Law ceased supplying data on inflow and cases on hand in December 2014, so these quantities are no longer recorded. Court of Appeal data come directly from the Court of Appeal and cover a longer timescale than data from Crown Law. Data are taken from live databases, which are actively cleaned as later information regarding e.g. aliases comes to hand; recent data poi...