Search Results

1. MG & MT v CH [2024] NZDT 671 (26 August 2024) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the p...

2. IQ Ltd v D Ltd & Ors [2024] NZDT 674 (8 September 2024) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

3. OD v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 738 (16 October 2024) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

4. OIA-120407.pdf [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...sovereign citizens? If the reason for self-representation is recorded. If so, could I also get this broken down region by region over the last 10 years? I would like to add to this if possible (let me know). • Seeking stats on the number of appeals filed by self-representing applicants over the last 10 years, broken down into civil and criminal cases, and by region? (Same as my previous email) • Also seeking, as a percentage, the number appeals filed by those self- representing...

5. [2021] NZEnvC 115 Te Whanau a Kai Trust v Gisborne District Council [pdf, 9.4 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Court: Hearing: Last event: Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 115 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14(1) of the First Schedule to the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN AND AND TE WHANAU A KAI TRUST (ENV-2017-WLG-000088) Appellant GISBORNE DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED MURRAY PALMER TUIWARMENHOVEN HORTICULTURE NZ RONGOWHA...

6. [2019] NZEnvC 032 Tauranga City Council v Minister of Education [pdf, 917 KB]

   'BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC032- of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 174(1) of the Act TAURANGA CITY COUNCIL (ENV-20 18-AKL-007) Appellant MINISTER OF EDUCATION Respondent Principal Environment Judge L J Newhook Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick at Auckland on 19 November 2018 P M S McNamara and T R Fisch...

7. EMPC Practical guide to litigating in the Employment Court [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...focussed cross-examination. Quantification of alleged losses and steps taken to mitigate loss are often absent or not adequately addressed. 37 Other than security for costs pending appeal provided for in reg 69. 38 Regulation 33. 39 Regulation 35. 40 Clause 12, Sch 3. http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2000/0250/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM61709 http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2000/0250/la...

8. Franklin v CAC 20005 & Bailey [2013] NZREADT 77 [pdf, 51 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZREADT 77 READT 72/12 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN KIM FRANKLIN Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20005) First respondent AND CAMERON BAILEY Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Member Mr J Gaukrodger - Member HEARD at CHRISTCHURCH on 3 July 2013 DATE OF D...

9. Lakhan v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 414) v Ling Zhu [2017] NZREADT 75 [pdf, 203 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2017] NZREADT 75 READT 026/17 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN ANJAY and RESHMI LAKHAN Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 414) First Respondent AND LING ZHU Second Respondent Hearing: 23 November 2017, at Auckland Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Ms N Dangen, Member Ms C Sand...

10. Gao & Simons v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 20005) & Ors [2016] NZREADT 82 [pdf, 184 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 82 READT 056/14 UNDER THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS ACT 2008 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 111 OF THE ACT BETWEEN H GAO AND MARTIN SIMONS Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20005) First respondent AND HAYDEN BROADBELT AND ADRIEEN GOOCH Second respondents Hearing: At Auckland on 15-16 February 2016 and 24 June 2016 Tribunal...