Search Results

1. FAQs

   ...will I need to provide? Will I need a lawyer? Do I have to pay to use the Tribunal? How does the Tribunal work? What powers does the Tribunal have? Who are the Tribunal members? How long will the process take? Can Tribunal decisions be appealed? How does mediation work in the Tribunal? What happens at case management conferences? What happens if I settle my claim with the insurer privately? How do hearings work? Will the Tribunal visit my property? What’s the difference be...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal

2. Auckland Standards Committee v Comeskey [2010] NZLCDT 19 [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...that he was not entitled to charge for. (c) Auckland Section 356 Standards Committee of the New Zealand Law Society charged Mr Comeskey pursuant to the 1982 Act that on or about 14 February 2008 he made a misleading submission to the Court of Appeal and in doing so was negligent or incompetent in his professional capacity to such a degree as to tend to bring the profession into disrepute. (d) Auckland Standards Committee 1 of the New Zealand Law Society charged Mr Comeskey pur...

3. ENV-2016-AKL-000194 Highgate Business Park Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND ENV·2016·AKL· of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 ("LGATPA") and the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") of an appeal under section 156(3) of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearing Panel ("Hearing Panel") on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan ("Proposed Pla...

4. [2017] NZSAAA 01 (18 May 2017) [pdf, 435 KB]

   Decision No. [2017] NZSAAA 01 Reference No. SAA 003/16 IN THE MATTER of the Education Act 1989 and the Student Allowances Regulations 1998 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Whangarei against a decision of the Chief Executive, Ministry of Social Development BEFORE THE STUDENT ALLOWANCE APPEAL AUTHORITY Neil Cameron HEARING on the papers DECISION The appeal is upheld REASONS Overview [1] This is an appeal against the...

5. [2022] NZEnvC 160 Tararua District Council v Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council [pdf, 1007 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE IVIA TIER Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 160 of appeals under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN TAR.ARDA DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2021-WLG-000031) ]BENT AND AND (ENV-2021-WLG-000030) Appellants MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent TAR.ARDA DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant Environment Judge BP Dwyer Environment Commiss...

6. [2021] NZEnvC 051 Rangitane O Tamaki v Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council [pdf, 4.6 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER OF Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 51 appeals under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN RANGITANE O TAMAI<.I NUI A RUA INCORPORATED AND AND (ENV-2018-WLG-000034) TARARUA COUNCIL DISTRICT (ENV-2018-WLG-000035) Appellants IvlANA WATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent TARARUA DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant Envir...

7. [2015] NZSAAA 04, (18 June 2015) [pdf, 46 KB]

   Decision No. [2015] NZSAAA 04 Reference No. SAA 002/15 IN THE MATTER of the Education Act 1989 and the Student Allowances Regulations 1998 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of the Chief Executive, Ministry of Social Development BEFORE THE STUDENT ALLOWANCE APPEAL AUTHORITY Neil Cameron HEARING on the papers DECISION The appeal is dismissed REASONS Overview [1] This is an appeal...

8. UJ v OO LCRO 143 / 2012 (9 April 2013) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...UJ instructed Mr OO, Mr UJ had represented himself in: a. A Family Court hearing in [date in 2007], relating to division of relationship property, in which the Court decided that the property was to be split 65:35 in favour of Ms UK; and b. An appeal to the High Court, in [date in 2007], of the Family Court’s decision on apportionment of the relationship property. Mr UJ initially acted for himself, but a Barrister, Mr UL, appeared at the hearing. The appeal was only allowed in...

9. ENV-2016-AKL-000271 Bunnings Limited v Auckland Transport [pdf, 857 KB]

   ...and (c) Auckland Transport's requiring authority decision on 30 September 2016 ("Decision"). 3. The Appellant is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308D of the RMA. Parts of the Decision that the Appellant is appealing 4. The Appellant appeals the part of the Decision that seeks to retain Designation 1453. Part of this designation overlies Bunnings' site at 2-12 Titirangi Road ("New Lynn Site"). General reasons for appeal...

10. ENV-2016-AKL-000272 J Mawson v Auckland Transport [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    ...requiring authority decision on 30 September 2016 ("Decision"). 3. The Appellant is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 3080 of the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA"). Parts of the Decision that the Appellant is appealing 4. The Appellant appeals the part of the Decision that seeks to retain Designation 1453. General reasons for appeal 5. The reasons for this appeal are that retaining Designation 1453: (a) will not promote sustainable manageme...