Search Results

1. IE v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 587 (12 August 2024) [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...by X Ltd, there is no basis for recovering it from X Ltd. (d) IE did not participate in the Family Court proceedings. He attributed his non-attendance to errors in the [Court] process. However, both the High Court and a subsequent Court of Appeal decision confirmed that IE “did have notice of the hearing on 18 February” and that “IE’s fair hearing rights had not been breached”. It is not clear what different outcome might have been achieved had IE attended. However, a...

2. Defending a proceeding in the High Court

   ...This section outlines how you can defend the following types of proceeding in the High Court: Defending a general civil proceeding - someone wants to recover money or settle a dispute Defending an originating application Defending a civil appeal - someone has asked a senior court to reconsider a judge's decision Defending a bankruptcy notice - someone has applied to have you declared insolvent or unable to pay your debts Defending a creditor’s application for adjudication...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court >
   3. Going to court without a lawyer >
   4. Representing yourself in a civil case in the High Court

3. ENV-2018-AKL-000149 Fulton Hogan Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 7.9 MB]

   NOTICE OF APPEAL 26 JULY 2018 Counsel instructed: Bal Matheson Richmond Chambers PO Box 1008 Auckland 1140 Solicitor acting: D J Minhinnick I L J Eaton P +64 9 367 8000 F +64 9 367 8163 PO Box 8 DX CX10085 Auckland BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV–2018–AKL - AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO I TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE UNDER the Local Government Act (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 ("LGATPA ") and...

4. Ms C v CAC 10036 & Whitehorn [2012] NZREADT 53 [pdf, 47 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2012] NZREADT 53 Reference No: READT 085/11 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN MS C Applicant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 10036) First respondent AND TONI WHITEHORN Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Member Mr J Gaukrodger - Member BY CONSENT HEARD ON THE PAPER...

5. ABC Trust v G Ltd [2021] NZDT 1307 (16 April 2021) [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

6. [2020] NZEnvC 127 Lindis Catchment Group Incorporated v Otago Regional Council [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...application for costs. [27] Counsel notes that while it has not strictly complied with the default timetable set out in the Practice Note, the Practice Note has not been drafted to deal with the complexity of the present proceedings where two appeals are inextricably linked, yet to be concluded and have been appealed to the High Court by Fish and Game anyway. LCG contends that, while it did not seek an extension for filing or otherwise indicate to Fish and Game that it intended...

7. NT v HS [2020] NZDT 1312 (21 October 2020) [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

8. HI, UI, LN and BJ Ltd v QD Ltd DU and HS Ltd [2021] NZDT 1660 (25 October 2021) [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

9. SN v VO Ltd [2021] NZDT 1679 (29 October 2021) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

10. [2022] NZIACDT 8 - IF v Registrar (2 May 2022) [pdf, 111 KB]

    ...upholding the complaint against the adviser. [33] The Tribunal issued directions on 16 February 2022 setting out a timeframe for further submissions and supporting information. Submissions of the appellant [34] The appellant’s reasons for appealing are set out on the appeal form (31 January 2022). He disagrees with certain findings of the Registrar: 2 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 54(3). http://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2007/0015/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM407351#D...