Search Results

1. MD & ND v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 626 (19 July 2024) [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of t...

2. MC v Q Association [2024] NZDT 317 (24 April 2024) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the...

3. QQ v R Ltd [2024] NZDT 741 (2 October 2024) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of t...

4. H Ltd v HF [2025] NZDT 168 (24 February 2025) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accepte...

5. T Ltd v O Inc [2025] NZDT 169 (13 February 2025) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accepte...

6. [2015] NZEmpC 219 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...AFFCO to substantiate its allegation by evidence that can be tested in court. Until that is established, therefore, AFFCO’s allegation remains just that. In any event, judgments of this Court now record the position, subject of course to any appeals. An appeal? [29] Counsel advise, not surprisingly, that AFFCO has sought the leave of the Court of Appeal to appeal against the full Court’s judgment and has sought both urgency for the hearing of that application for...

7. Kozlov v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 416) and Hall & Lindsay [2018] NZREADT 38 [pdf, 241 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 38 READT 008/18 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN ANDREI ALEKSANDROVICH KOZLOV Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 416) First Respondent AND SUSAN HALL & RICHARD LINDSAY Second Respondent On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Ms C Sandelin, Member Mr N...

8. [2021] NZREADT 14 - Ogilvie v The Real Estate Agents Authority & Abel (6 April 2021) [pdf, 221 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 14 READT 030/20 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN RUTH OGILVIE Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1901) First Respondent AND KEIGHLY ABEL Second Respondent Hearing: 10 March 2021, at Napier Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Ms C Sandelin, Member Mr N O’Connor, Me...

9. Welsh — Part Awarua Block (2009) 7 Taitokerau Appellate MB 122 (7 APWH 122) [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...Ambler ordered that Part Awarua Block 7 Taitokerau Appellate MB 123 (“the school site”), be vested in the former owners and also declared that the land shall become Māori freehold land (123 Whangarei MB 17). [2] Mr Stanley Welsh appeals that decision and argues that the school site should have been vested solely in Maraina Wi Mura. Background [3] On 26 May 1915 the Native Land Court investigated customary land known as Awarua. On 26 May 1915 the Court issued a f...

10. [2020] NZEnvC 123 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 3.1 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl OTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 123 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act UPPER CLUTHA ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-056) DARBY PLANNING LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-150) Appellants QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Sitti...