Search Results

1. Griffiths v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury) [2023] NZACC 201 [pdf, 285 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 201 ACAR 201/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN VICTORIA GRIFFITHS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 11 May 2023 Heard at: Auckland Appearances: Joshua Garry, partner and representative of the appellant Victoria Griffiths Fenella Becroft for respondent...

2. [2023] NZREADT 19 - NQ v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 2104) (9 August 2023) [pdf, 169 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2023] NZREADT 19 Reference No: READT 013/2022 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN NQ Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2104) First Respondent AND NT Second Respondent AND IAN BOSWELL Third Respondent Tribunal: D J Plunkett (Chair) G J Denley (Member) F J Mathieson (Member) Representation The appellan...

3. LCRO 118/2023 TC v GS (13 December 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...seek to address appropriately, the risk of an appeal against the Court approval of the alienation of Māori freehold land. The right of appeal is plainly available as a matter of law. It is available to anyone who can argue they are affected. Such appeals are not uncommon. [75] The respondent obviously could not certify to the bank that no appeal could or would be made. All he sought to do was to exclude that matter from his certificate and have the bank assess and take its own risk...

4. Contact the Customs Appeal Authority

   Phone: 04 462 6660 Fax: 04 462 6686 Email: CAA@justice.govt.nz Postal address: Customs Appeal Authority Tribunals UnitDX SX 11159 Wellington Street address:Customs Appeal Authority Tribunals Unit Level 1, 86 Customhouse Quay Wellington

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Customs

5. [2007] NZEmpC AC 49/07 Landmarx Developments (NZ) Ltd v Raman [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...Therefore, to be within the statutory time, the applicant should have filed its challenge by 2 April 2007 at the latest. Instead some 85 days after that date, namely on 27 June 2007, the applicant filed what was described as an application for leave to appeal out of time. Principles [2] The Court has jurisdiction to grant leave to extend time by s219 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 which provides: 219 Validation of informal proceedings, etc (1) If anything w...

6. [2012] NZEmpC 154 NZ Meat Workers Union v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...had received submissions from the defendant seeking costs, no submissions in response had ever been received from the plaintiff, despite reminders from the Registry. Initially there was some explanation in that the plaintiff had sought leave to appeal my substantive judgment but in January 2012 the Acting Registrar received advice that the Court of Appeal had dismissed the plaintiff’s application for leave to appeal. There were then some other extenuating circumstances which I had...

7. ENV-2016-AKL-270,275 Tram Lease Ltd & Dilworth Trust Board v NZ Transport Agency [pdf, 4.5 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) and the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGA TPA) AND appeals under s 157(1) of the LGATPA BETWEEN AND AND TRAM LEASE LIMITED ENV-2016-AKL-000270 DILWORTH TRUST BOARD ENV-2016-AKL-000275 Appellants NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY Respondent AUCKLAND COUNCIL Territorial Authority Principal Environment Judge L J Newhook sitting alone under s 279 of ,the Ac...

8. [2020] NZEmpC 9 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...based on the scale. The quantum amount claimed under the scale is not contested. I therefore adopt the cost figure of $26,760, and disbursements figure of $2,576.58, as starting points. Calderbank offers [9] The judgment of the Court of Appeal in Bluestar Print Group (NZ) Ltd v Mitchell provides a helpful description of the applicable principles when considering Calderbank offers.3 3 Bluestar Print Group (NZ) Ltd v Mitchel...

9. [2022] NZREADT 6 - Lawrence v REAA (11 April 2022) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...evidence, an opportunity which was previously afforded to them in the first instance. 1 [Redacted]. 2 New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 27(1) (right to natural justice). 3 [7] A review hearing may be seen to operate akin to an appeal, as it will give the Tribunal the power to confirm, reverse or modify the decision. If there was an appeal, the licensees would be a party to the appeal on the basis that the decision affected them. [8] The Tribunal can regulate its...

10. [2021] NZACC 192 - Beban v ACC (2 December 2021) [pdf, 177 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 192 ACR 130/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ANNETTE BEBAN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 25 November 2021 Held at: Rotorua/Rotorua-Nui-A-Kahumatamomoe Appearances: A Carlyle for the appellant F Becroft for the respondent...