Search Results

1. National Standards Committee v Orlov [2013] NZLCDT 45 [pdf, 390 KB]

   ...encompassed in the judicial review application and the current charges were treated as subject to the same adjournment ruling. 4 [5] Justice Heath’s decision in respect of the judicial review, which was delivered on 24 August 2012 was then appealed by Mr Orlov to the Court of Appeal. The Standards Committee cross-appealed. [6] The decision of the Court of Appeal1 was released in June of this year. In dismissing Mr Orlov’s appeal and granting the Standard Committee...

2. BORA Resource Management Amendment Bill [pdf, 332 KB]

   ...duplicate or overlap with other legislation. This Bill repeals the ability to make such regulations. PCO 21656/9.3 Drafted by Parliamentary Counsel IN CONFIDENCE PCO 21656 v 9.3: 28 August 2019: 2:37 p.m. Removing preclusions on public notification and appeals for subdivision and residential activity resource consents, and restrictions on the scope of appeals Certain types of resource consent applications cannot currently be notified to the pub- lic for submissions, or appealed to the Env...

3. [2013] NZEmpC 66 Hall v Westpac NZ Ltd [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...consistent with the principles of the Act and the scheme under it for determining personal grievances. [9] Mr Drake spent more time on the third question. Mr Hall seeks exemplary damages. Mr Drake conceded that there are authorities of the Court of Appeal, notably Paper Reclaim Ltd v Aotearoa International Ltd 3 and the decision of this Court in Prins v Tirohanga Group Ltd 4 which held that the remedy of exemplary damages is not available in respect of a contractual breach inc...

4. K v N [2013] NZREADT 111 [pdf, 91 KB]

   Decision No: [2013] NZREADT 111 Reference No: READT 069/12 & READT 070/12 IN THE MATTER OF appeals under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN MR K Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20002) First respondent AND MR N Second respondent AND BETWEEN MR N Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20002) First respondent AND MR K Second respond...

5. Martin v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 407) & Ors [2017] NZREADT 14 [pdf, 209 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2017] NZREADT 14 READT 064/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN RUSSELL MARTIN Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 407) First Respondent AND NATHAN TAMIHANA Second Respondent AND GOLD REAL ESTATE GROUP LIMITED Third Respondent On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Cha...

6. Piper v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 408) & Ors [2017] NZREADT 32 [pdf, 239 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2017] NZREADT 32 IN THE MATTER OF Appeals under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 READT 033/16 BETWEEN BRENT PIPER Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 408) First Respondent AND STEPHEN HOTCHIN and VALERIE HOTCHIN-DAVIES Second Respondents READT 037/16 BETWEEN ANTHONY EBERT Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 408)...

7. Graphs for 2017-2021 Crown Law forecast report [xlsx, 85 KB]

   ..."Crown Law Numbers", actual figures up to and including March 2017 have been added to the Crown Law data table. Crown Law ceased supplying data on inflow and cases on hand in December 2014, so these quantities are no longer recorded. Court of Appeal data come directly from the Court of Appeal and cover a longer timescale than data from Crown Law. Data are taken from live databases, which are actively cleaned as later information regarding e.g. aliases comes to hand; recent data poi...

8. Aperahama v Anderson - Section 57 of the Ratana Pa [2022] Māori Appellate Court MB 424 (2022 APPEAL 424) [pdf, 275 KB]

   2022 Māori Appellate Court MB 424 I TE KOOTI PĪRA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Appellate Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20220006084 Appeal 2022/5 WĀHANGA Under Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Sections 57, 58, 70, 72 and 100 of the Rātana Pā Block I WAENGA I A Between HARERUIA APERAHAMA, ANDRE MEIHANA, WIKITORIA WAITAI-RAPANA, PIKI-TE-ORA MANUEL, LANCE RAPANA, TI...

9. [2015] NZSSAA 022, 2 April [pdf, 26 KB]

   [2015] NZSSAA 022 Reference No. SSA 069/14 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member DECISION ON THE PAPERS Introduction [1] The appellant appeals against a decision of the Chief Executive upheld by a Benefits Review...

10. [2016] NZSSAA 108 (21 December 2016) [pdf, 135 KB]

    ...Lower Hutt against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee DECISION OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN RELATION TO APPEAL BY WAY OF CASE STATED [1] The appellant has lodged an appeal in respect of the Authority’s decision of 24 May 2016. [2] Appeals from the Authority’s decisions are limited to questions of law. There is no general right of appeal. [3] In accordance with the provisions of the Social Security Act 1964, the appellant has been requested to lodge a draft Case...