Search Results

1. [2016] NZSSAA 078 (22 August 2016) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...Tureiti Moxon - Member HEARING at AUCKLAND on 29 July 2016 APPEARANCES No appearance by or on behalf of the appellant A Singh for the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development DECISION Introduction [1] The appellant appealed to the Authority in respect of decisions of the Chief Executive, upheld by a Benefits Review Committee, to: (a) suspend payment of New Zealand Superannuation to the appellant and his partner from February 2015; and (b) establ...

2. Gustafson v CAC404 & Chambers [2016] NZREADT 46 [pdf, 119 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 46 READT 079/15 UNDER THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS ACT 2008 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 111 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ALASTAIR GUSTAFSON Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 404) First respondent AND ALAN CHAMBERS Second respondent Hearing: 25 May 2016 Tribunal: Ms K Davenport QC – Chairperson Mr G Denley – Member Ms C Sandelin –...

3. [2016] NZSSAA 66 (11 July 2016) [pdf, 111 KB]

   [2016] NZSSAA 066 Reference No. SSA 141/15 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Hastings against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member DECISION ON THE PAPERS Introduction [1] The appellant has appealed to the Authority in respect of a decision of...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 199 Rangitata Water Limited v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 1 MB]

   " S~A I. o~ I: BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND AND AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 199 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals pursuant to s 120 of the Act RANGITATA WATER LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-174) TE RONANGA 0 AROWHENUA & TE RUNANGA 0 NGAI TAHU (ENV-2018-CHC-175) PAUL HODGSON & OTHERS (ENV-2018-CHC-176) Appellants CANTERBURY REGIONAL COUNCIL & ASHBURTON DISTRICT CO...

5. [2018] NZEnvC 204 East Harbour Environmental Association Incorporated v Hutt City Council [pdf, 408 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 204 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under Clause 14 of the 1 st Schedule to the Act EAST HARBOUR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED (EHEA) (ENV-2016-WLG-000030) Appellant HUTT CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge B P Dwyer Environment Commissioner K A Edmonds Hearing: Following the hearing Date of Decision: 1...

6. [2022] NZACC 14 - Mackley v ACC (26 January 2022) [pdf, 169 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 014 ACR 132/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN NEIL MACKLEY Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Appearances: Mr B Hinchcliff for the appellant Mr P McBride for the respondent Judgment: 26 January 2022 ________________________________...

7. [2022] NZENVC 168 Fonterra Ltd v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 354 KB]

   ...achieving the relevant objectives of the 2GP. [5] The court will only make orders if it is satisfied it is appropriate to do so and where there is no relationship between the provisions proposed to be amended by the consent order and other appeals before the court. [6] Mr Rawson has assessed the other appeals on decisions on 2GP and advises that there is no overlap between appeals that would prevent a consent order from being issued. In addition, Mr Rawson says that no appeal o...

8. BK v XQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 261 (13 December 2022) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...minutes were free. BK did not however notice the smaller writing stating anyone entering the carpark was required to display a ticket. As BK did not display a ticket, she was given a Parking Breach Notice for $65. BK disputed the notice however her appeal was declined. A further $20 was then added to the notice for late payment. BK paid this amount. 2. On 21 September 2022, BK parked in another XQ Ltd Carpark. This carpark required payment via an app however BK did not activate t...

9. KX v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 803 (17 September 2024) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...‘supply’. I therefore concur with KX’s view that section 41 must be intended to refer to original supply (by a ‘supplier’, as defined in the Act). CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 7. More importantly, as KX submits, the Court of Appeal has confirmed the interpretation and application of the manufacturer provisions of the CGA, in the case of Body Corporate Number DPS 91535 & Ors v 3A Composites GmbH [2023] NZCA 647. He references clause 84 of the decision: “t...

10. Miller v CAC 10017 & McAtamneys [2012] NZREADT 25 [pdf, 127 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2012] NZREADT 25 READT 030/11 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN PAUL DAVID MILLER Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 10017) First respondent AND DAVID AND EDNA McATAMNEY Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Ms J Robson - Member Mr J Gaukrodger - Member BY CONSENT HEARD ON THE PAPERS...