Search Results

1. MM v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 406 (22 April 2024) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the p...

2. KS & TC v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 565 (5 August 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the p...

3. JT & QL v SQ & TQ [2024] NZDT 855 (10 September 2024) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the p...

4. Smith v ACC [2010] NZACA 7 [pdf, 90 KB]

   [2010] NZACA 7 ACA 009/08 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s.107 of the Act BETWEEN GLEN ELTYN SMITH of Auckland Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION a body corporate duly constituted under the provisions of the said Act Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY P J Cartwright HEARING at AUCKLAND on 19 February 2010 APPEARANCES/COUNSEL...

5. [2021] NZREADT 37 Watson (20 July 2021) [pdf, 212 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 37 READT 034/2020 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN GREGORY ERNEST WATSON and KELLY WATSON Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1906) First Respondent AND JACEUELINE BERRY and BULSARA LTD (t/a Tall Poppy Real Estate) Second Respondents Hearing: 29 June 2021, by AVL Tribunal:...

6. [2009] NZEmpC WC 14/09 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...collective agreement including, in particular, its remuneration provisions. [25] The plaintiff’s argument is based on an interpretation of the statutory definition of a collective agreement and several statements in recent judgments of the Court of Appeal dealing with allied questions. The defendant’s response is that the trial agreement is not a collective agreement because it fails to meet all the requirements of s54 and, in particular, those in s54(3). Decision [26] The...

7. REAA CAC 10017 v Miller [2014] NZREADT 70 [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...conduct in not disclosing the information was misconduct. More particularly, we held that Mr Miller’s conduct amounted to misconduct under both s.73(a) (disgraceful conduct) and s.73(b) (serious negligence or serious incompetence). [7] Mr Miller appealed to the High Court against our finding of disgraceful conduct under s.73(a), but not against the finding of serious negligence or serious incompetence under s.73(b). The Authority (i.e. the prosecution) ultimately consented to the ap...

8. Munley v CAC 402 & Ors [2016] NZREADT 53 [pdf, 195 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 53 READT 077/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN MICHAEL ANTHONY MUNLEY Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 402) First respondent AND STEPHANIE KELLAND, STEPHEN WILLIAMS & MEGAN JAFFE REAL ESTATE LTD Second respondents Hearing: 25 July 2016 (in Auckland) Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews (Ch...

9. Ruka - Taheke 23A and 23B [2010] 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 629 (2010 APPEAL 629) [pdf, 97 KB]

   RUKA MAC 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 629 23 December 2010 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 629 (2010 APPEAL 629) A20100009428 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal against an order of the Maori Land Court made on 13 May 2010 at 5 Taitokerau MB 186-190 in respect of Taheke 23A and 23B BETWEEN ARTHUR ROBERT REIHANA RUKA Appellant Hearing: 10 No...

10. Brill v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 409) & Ors [2017] NZREADT 28 [pdf, 237 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2017] NZREADT 28 READT 036/16 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN JEFFREY BRILL Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 409) First Respondent AND BRIAN DIXON and JUDITH ARNOLD Second Respondents On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger, Member Ms N Dangen, Member...