14959 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2019] NZREADT 24 READT 052/18 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN AKHIL CHAND CHAUDHARY Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 414) First Respondent AND SUBARMANI RAJAN and SUMINTRA DEVI Second Respondents On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Ms C Sandelin, Member Mr N O...
STRAIN & WEL v QLDC – DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 291 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act concerning Stage 2, Topic 31 of the Proposed Queenstown Lakes District Plan BETWEEN ANTONY STRAIN, SARAH STRAIN & SAMUEL STRAIN (ENV-2019-CHC-56) AND WAKATIPU EQUITIES LIMITED (ENV-2019-CHC-65) Appellants...
Phone: 04 462 6660 Fax: 04 462 6686 Email: CAA@justice.govt.nz Postal address: Customs Appeal Authority Tribunals UnitDX SX 11159 Wellington Street address:Customs Appeal Authority Tribunals Unit Level 1, 86 Customhouse Quay Wellington
...[37] The IPP 6 request for the audio file [40] The calculation of time [45] The course of the misconduct charges [47] Audio file placed on disk but overlooked [56] Whether Mr Taylor made request for the audio file subsequent to withdrawal of his appeal [60] The Inspectorate [77] The format issue [81] The complaint to the Privacy Commissioner – Corrections alerted that recording not provided to Mr Taylor [88] The apology [94] The training issue [99] The propensity evidence tende...
...First Appellant Walter Moffatt Second Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF APPEAL Dated: 16 September 2016 To: The Registrar Environment Court Auckland Page 2 1. Ratepayers Association Incorporated (the Appellant) appeals against part of a decision of the Auckland Council (the Council) on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Proposed Plan) . 2. The Appellant has the right to appeal the Council's decision - (a) Under section 156(3) of the LGATPA becaus...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 201 ACAR 201/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN VICTORIA GRIFFITHS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 11 May 2023 Heard at: Auckland Appearances: Joshua Garry, partner and representative of the appellant Victoria Griffiths Fenella Becroft for respondent...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2023] NZREADT 19 Reference No: READT 013/2022 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN NQ Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2104) First Respondent AND NT Second Respondent AND IAN BOSWELL Third Respondent Tribunal: D J Plunkett (Chair) G J Denley (Member) F J Mathieson (Member) Representation The appellan...
...seek to address appropriately, the risk of an appeal against the Court approval of the alienation of Māori freehold land. The right of appeal is plainly available as a matter of law. It is available to anyone who can argue they are affected. Such appeals are not uncommon. [75] The respondent obviously could not certify to the bank that no appeal could or would be made. All he sought to do was to exclude that matter from his certificate and have the bank assess and take its own risk...
...Therefore, to be within the statutory time, the applicant should have filed its challenge by 2 April 2007 at the latest. Instead some 85 days after that date, namely on 27 June 2007, the applicant filed what was described as an application for leave to appeal out of time. Principles [2] The Court has jurisdiction to grant leave to extend time by s219 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 which provides: 219 Validation of informal proceedings, etc (1) If anything w...
...had received submissions from the defendant seeking costs, no submissions in response had ever been received from the plaintiff, despite reminders from the Registry. Initially there was some explanation in that the plaintiff had sought leave to appeal my substantive judgment but in January 2012 the Acting Registrar received advice that the Court of Appeal had dismissed the plaintiff’s application for leave to appeal. There were then some other extenuating circumstances which I had...