Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 056 Auckland Council v Auckland Council [pdf, 663 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 5 fa IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN AUCKLAND COUNCIL (ENV-2017-AKL-190) Applicant/Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J A Smith Environment Judge 0 A Kirkpatrick Hearing: at Auckland on 9 April February 2018 Appearances: J C Campbell and R J Wilson for Auckland Cou...

2. 2017 NZSSAA 060 (18 October 2017) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...[2017] NZSSAA 052. In that case the Authority directed the Chief Executive to disclose the names of all members of the Benefit Review Committee which have dealt with appeals by that appellant. That decision is attached. The Chief Executive has appealed this decision. [3] The Authority will be bound by the decision of the High Court on this appeal. Therefore it is appropriate that, if the appellant wishes to pursue the issue of the anonymity of the Remote Client Unit and the...

3. [2019] NZEnvC 104 Moase v Auckland Council [pdf, 4.5 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC lo~ of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) of a purported appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act GORDON MOASE Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent WAIMUMU ROAD DEVELOPMENT LIMITED Applicant Court: Environment Judge M Harland sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Date of Decision: l O JiJ~ ;lbl 9 Date of Issue: 1 JU_ 1 2019 DE...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 131 Bay of Plenty District Health Board v Culturesafe New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...appeal but involves judicial review proceedings which a litigant may bring as of right and without obtaining prior leave. That said, the normal 2 For example, Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [2020] NZEmpC 143. principles which relate to appeals may still assist this Court in assessing the interests of justice. They include: (a) If no stay is granted, whether the right to seek judicial review relief will be rendered ineffectual; (b) whether any party will be injuriously...

5. [2021] NZEnvC 177 Campbell's Block Limited v Southland Regional Council [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...any restriction on the maximum hectares of IWG per farm, suggested a percentage control, if used, of 30- 40% of total landholding and requested any regulation instead be linked to water quality outcomes. (c) Robert Grant and Campbell’s Block appealed part of the IWG rule, Rule 3 20(a)(iii)(1), to the Environment Court. (d) Wilkins filed s274 parties in support of the relief sought in those appeals as it relates to the IWG rule, Rule 20(a)(iii)(1). (e) In accordance with s27...

6. [2022] NZACC 38 – Jones v ACC (14 March 2022) [pdf, 199 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 38 ACR 340/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN STUART JONES Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 14 March 2022 DECISION OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Leave to appeal] Introduction [1] This is an application...

7. Trustees of the Maungatautari 4G Section IV Trust v Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust - Maungatautari No 4G Sec IV [2015] Māori Appellate Court MB 634 (2015 APPEAL 634) [pdf, 314 KB]

   2015 Māori Appellate Court MB 634 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20150001617 APPEAL 2015/9 UNDER Sections 58 and 79 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Maungatautari No 4G Sec IV Block BETWEEN TRUSTEES OF THE MAUNGATAUTARI 4G SECTION IV TRUST Appellants AND MAUNGATAUTARI ECOLOGICAL ISLAND TRUST First Respondent AND WAIPA DISTRICT COUNCIL Second Respondent AND TED TAUROA Thir...

8. Ratahi v Parininihi Ki Waitotara Incorporation - Section 53 Block IX Opunake SD being part Ngati Kahumate Block comprised in CT D4/240 (2007) 195 Aotea MB 127 (195 AOT 127) [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...proceedings and instead directed that a judicial conference be convened to discuss time-tabling orders to give the applicants the chance to present their case in opposition. At a subsequent judicial conference Mrs Hughes raised the issue of leave to appeal my decision of 10 August 2007, which she referred to as a provisional or preliminary determination. A hearing was then set down for 17 October 2007 where all counsel, apart from Mr Lawrence who was unavailable due to illness, made...

9. Legal aid criminal case assignment report - 1 December 2013 to 30 November 2014 [pdf, 554 KB]

   ...5.4 1 Category 4 Statistics (Excluding Public Defence Service) Number of Providers Average Assignments per Provider Median Assignments per Provider Ashburton 6 1.2 1 Auckland 61 2.2 2 Blenheim 7 2.9 1 Christchurch 30 2.3 2 Court of Appeal of New Zealand 131 1.9 1 Dargaville 1 1.0 1 Dunedin 8 2.0 2 Gisborne 10 2.5 2 Greymouth 2 2.0 2 Hamilton 22 3.8 2 Hastings 3 2.7 3 Hawera 3 1.0 1 Huntly 1 1.0 1 Hutt Valley 7 1.1 1 Invercargill 7 1.7 1 Kaikohe 10 2.3 1 Kaitaia...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 125 White & Others v Reserve Bank of NZ [pdf, 59 KB]

    ...within 21 days and Mr O’Sullivan, counsel for the plaintiffs, was given a like time in which to respond. [2] On 26 March 2012, the Registrar received a letter from Mr Chemis confirming that as the plaintiffs had filed an application for leave to appeal my judgment to the Court of Appeal, the defendant considered it would be more appropriate for the issue of costs to be determined following the resolution of the application for leave and any subsequent appeal....