14337 items matching your search terms
...and Tribunals Centre Level 2, 41 Federal Street Auckland 1010 PO Box 7174, Wellesley St., Auckland 1141 1. I, K Vernon, wish to be a party to the following proceedings: Auckland Council, Proposed combined Auckland (Unitary) Plan, Appeal ENV – 2016 – AKL - 186 ENV – 2016 – AKL - 185 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Ltd 2. I am a person who has an interest in the proceedings that is greater than the interest that the general public has because the outcome...
2021 Māori Appellate Court MB 379 I TE KOOTI PĪRA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O WAIKATO MANIAPOTO In the Māori Appellate Court of New Zealand Waikato Maniapoto District A20200004983 APPEAL 2020/3 WĀHANGA Under Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Harataunga West 2B 2A 1 (Te Paea O Hauraki Maori Reservation) I WAENGA I A Between JOHN THORNTON MCLEOD Kaitono pīra Appellant ME And NGA...
...Minister for the making of a Water Conservation Order for Te Puna Waiora o Te Waikoropupū and Wharepapa Arthur Marble Aquifer here: 2023-07-28-WCO-Final-Report-Recommendation.pdf [PDF, 5 MB] Proposed Waikato Regional Council Plan Change 1 See appeals filed on the Proposed Waikato Regional Council Plan Change 1: Waikato and Waipa River Catchments Appeals filed Ōtaki to North of Levin State Highway Project (O2NL) Find information and documents related to the New Zealand Transport Agen...
...unqualified right to an extension of time which would defeat the purpose of the rules which is to provide a time table for the conduct of litigation. [12] I also have regard to the general principle summarised by Richmond J in Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board [1973] 2 NZLR 86 at 91: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical change. Whereas previously he was in a position to appeal as of right, he now becomes an applica...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2012] NZREADT 74 READT 099/11 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN ANNA MOLENAAR Applicant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 10066) First respondent AND CATHERINE MacDONALD and RICHARD NEWMAN Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Ms J Robson - Member Mr G Denley - Member ALL EVIDENCE HEARD at QUEENST...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZREADT 14 READT 062/12 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN MARK MILLER Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20003) First respondent AND SHANE ROBINSON Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger - Member Mr G Denley - Member HEARD at DUNEDIN on 29 November 2012 DATE OF D...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZREADT 61 READT 082/13 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN RAFAL PRIOTR PIONTECKI AND SYLWIA PIONTECKA of Hamilton, Complainants Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY First respondent AND ANGELA DAVIES of Hamilton, Real Estate Agent Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger...
2018 Maori Appellate Court MB 47 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20170003094 APPEAL 2017/8 UNDER Section 58 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF The estate of Blewett Porou Williams also known as Porou Tumahuki ANARU WILLIAMS Appellant Hearing: 9 August 2017 (Heard at Whanganui) Court: Chief Judge W W Isaac (Presiding) Deputy Chief Judge C L Fox Judge C T Coxhead Appearances:...
...Judge Savage from 348 Rotorua MB 282 – 293 (2 December 2009) e) Copy of Reasons for Oral Judgement (Māori Appellate Court) at 2011 Māori Appellate Court 500 – 524 (31 August 2011) f) Copy of Judgement of the Court (New Zealand Court of Appeal), [2012] NZCA 350 g) Copy of certificate of title 453764 (Te Puke 2A 2A 2B) h) Google map Court research The Lower Court Application 18. On 11 November 2004 applications were lodged pursuant to sections 18(1)(a) and 19(1)...
...right to an extension of time which would defeat the purpose of the rules which is to provide a time table for the conduct of litigation. [7] The second general principle is that summarised by Richmond J in Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board [1973] 2 NZLR 86 at 91: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical change. Whereas previously he was in a position to appeal as of right, he now becomes an applicant for a gra...