14954 items matching your search terms
...Wellington Christchurch In the Environment Court of New Zealand at Auckland I mua i te Kōti Taiao o Aotearoa I te rohe o Tāmaki Makaurau ENV-2020-AKL-000083 under: the Resource Management Act 1991 in the matter of: an appeal pursuant to clause 14(1) of the First Schedule to the Resource Management Act 1991 between: Oji Fibre Solutions (NZ) Limited Appellant and: Waikato Regional Council Respondent 100423514/8081229 Form 33 NOTICE OF MER...
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND ENV- 2016 - AKL - 000185 IN THE MATTER of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 and the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under section 156( 1) of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 BETWEEN VIADUCT HARBOUR HOLDINGS LIMITED AND Ph: Fax: Email: Solicitor: Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent SECTION 274 NOTICE TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS Dated 5 Oc...
...costs against counsel personally. Tile Issue of costs against counsel has recently been addressed by the Privy CounCil In Its decision in Ihe appeal from I-/mlay v McDol1alcl (1099) 3 NZLR 545. In Ihe decision handed down by Lord Hope of Craighead (Appeals 9 and 50 of 2000) the Privy Council unanimously allowed the appeal against the decision of tile Court of Appeal 10 award costs personally agalnsl Mrs Harley as counsel, and Glasgow Harley, the solicitor on record. The Privy Council a...
...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...
CALVERT V DCC – 2GP – CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 154 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the Frist Schedule to the Act BETWEEN HILARY JANE CALVERT (ENV-2018-CHC-233) Appellant AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge P A Steven – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Conse...
Cooper v Kaipara District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 139 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) BETWEEN ALMA AND PETER COOPER, AMY AND GREG CRAMMOND, NIKKI HARRIS, SUSAN HODKINSON, NATASHA AND JOHN LEE, JONATHAN AND PATRICIA MCKINNEY (ENV-2022-AKL-000142) Appellants AND KAIPARA DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent AND VERMONT STREET PARTNERS...
CONSENT ORDER – MARINE FARMING ASSN & ORS v MDC IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 120 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN MARINE FARMING ASSOCIATION INC AND AQUACULTURE NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2020-CHC-74) Appellants AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitting alone...
TE KOTAHITANGA O TE ATIAWA TRUST & OTHERS V NEW PLYMOUTH DISTRICT COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 218 IN THE MATTER of an appeal against a proposed policy or plan under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN TE KOTAHITANGA O TE ATIAWA TRUST, TE RŪNANGA O NGĀTI MUTUNGA, TE KĀHUI O TARANAKI IWI TRUST, TE KĀHUI MARU TRUST, NGĀ MAHANGA A TAIRI HAPŪ, MANUKO...
On this page: Rehearings and appeals If you don’t follow an Order Managing a court-ordered debt Using the District Court to manage the debt The referee will give a written decision that shows how the dispute must be settled. If the decision is against you it will set out what you must do and by when. This is called an ‘Order’ and is legally binding (you must follow it). You and the other party will need to arrange how you’ll follow the Order. They may contact you to remind you what yo...
...that it required further information from the applicants in order to understand the applications and the trustees' proposal. After the trustees objected, the Council confirmed its earlier decision under section 3570 RMA. The trustees then appealed to the Environment Court under section 358 of the Act. This decision resolves that appeal. [5] There are currently four sets of proceedings - including these - between the parties which relate to the trustees' proposals. They are...