Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 195 The New Zealand King Salmon Co Ltd v Cerny [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...their claim may more accurately be characterised as a claim for arrears of pay under s. 11 of the Minimum Wage Act 1983 or s. 131 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). Their claim is based upon the principle confirmed by the Court of Appeal in Idea Services Ltd v Dickson [2011] NZCA 14; namely, they claim that they are employed to work on call from 4:30pm to 8:00am, during which period they do not receive the minimum hourly rate as required by the Minimum Wage Act. [3]...

2. [2013] NZEmpC 50 Foai v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...upon. I then heard nothing further until 6 November 2012 when Ms Greally filed an application for leave to file her submissions out of time. She explained that the reason for the delay initially was the fact that the defendant had sought leave to appeal my judgment to the Court of Appeal (leave was declined by the Court of Appeal on 1 August 2012). Ms Greally accepted responsibility for the delay thereafter which appeared principally to have been the result of a medical condition...

3. [2016] NZSSAA 115 (23 December 2016) [pdf, 148 KB]

   [2016] NZSSAA 115 Reference No. SSA 179A/15 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Auckland against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member HEARING at Auckland on 15 November 2016 and by video conference at Wellington on 17 November 2016. APPEARANCES...

4. [2010] NZCA 56 CA14/2010 Petersons Global Sales Ltd v PB Engineering Ltd Ors [pdf, 33 KB]

   PETERSONS GLOBAL SALES LIMITED AND ANOR V CARL JAMES PETERSON AND ANOR CA CA14/2010 5 March 2010 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA14/2010 [2010] NZCA 56 BETWEEN PETERSONS GLOBAL SALES LIMITED First Appellant AND P&B ENGINEERING LTD Second Appellant AND CARL JAMES PETERSON First Respondent AND KARL JACOB PETERSON Second Respondent Hearing: 16 February 2010 Court: O'Regan, Arnold and Baragwanath JJ Counsel: K T Browne for Appella...

5. [2016] NZSSAA 50 (31 May 2016) [pdf, 44 KB]

   [2016] NZSSAA 50 Reference No. SSA 054/13 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Auckland against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member DECISION ON THE PAPERS [1] The Authority issued a decision in relation to this matter on 14 September 2015. [2] At the conclusion of its...

6. [2020] NZEmpC 85 Labour Inspector v Cypress Villas Ltd [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...Relations Authority.1 A full Court of the Employment Court dealt with preliminary issues arising in the challenge.2 Barry Edward Brill, who was at that stage a proposed second defendant in the proceedings, applied for and was granted leave to appeal against the full Court’s decision to the Court of Appeal.3 His appeal was successful,4 1 Labour Inspector (MacRury) v Cypress Villas Ltd [2014] NZERA Auckland 124. 2 Labour Inspecto...

7. [2020] NZREADT 57 - Buchanan v The Real Estate Agents Authority (8 December 2020) [pdf, 229 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZREADT 57 READT 07/2020 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN IAN & SHARLEEN BUCHANAN Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 521) First Respondent AND KEVIN SEYMOUR & KAYLENE WAIN Second Respondents Hearing: 11 August 2020 Tribunal: Mr J Doogue, Deputy Chairperson Mr N O’Connor, Member...

8. E and E v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0013 [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...Alternatives Refuse the application [30] If this application by IAG is declined, then this case will proceed as scheduled. It might settle because of the toxicity of the secondary issues, but otherwise any determination by this Tribunal is likely to be appealed at least once. Of course, if the determination is not appealed, it will have a precedent effect in this Tribunal and be helpful for the GCCRS, but be of limited value to the High Court. I acknowledge that the case sta...

9. Bowden v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) and Bloemendal [2018] NZREADT 48 [pdf, 179 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 48 READT 021/18 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN KERRY LESLIE BOWDEN Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 403) First Respondent AND JESSICA BLOEMENDAL Second Respondent Hearing: 22 August 2018, at Auckland Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Mr G Denley, Member Ms C S...

10. Mokaraka v Mokaraka - Waima C8 (2023) 259 Taitokerau MB 3 (259 TTK 3) [pdf, 234 KB]

    ...occupation order in favour of Tahi. She varied the succession order for Tahi but only to adjust the amount of shares he received. She did not disturb the order vesting the occupation order in Tahi’s children. [12] Pani’s eight children appealed to the Māori Appellate Court arguing that Judge Fox should have overturned the previous orders concerning the house and the occupation order. On 22 February 2022, the Māori Appellate Court dismissed the appeal.7 3 31 Kaikohe MB...