Search Results

1. Auckland Standards Committee 3 v Potter [2022] NZLCDT 27 (27 July 2022) [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...somewhat haphazard as to salary, hours and location. Mr Potter seems to have been absent from Auckland frequently. Mr Potter was contemporaneously running a repiling business. [6] Mr Potter advised the client in relation to a relationship property appeal to the High Court. This work was somewhat informal. It precedes the matters which gave rise to the discrete charges, but it is relevant to understanding the relationship between Mr Potter and the client. The work that gave rise...

2. [2022] NZACC 5 – Estate of Raymond Morris v ACC (18 January 2022) [pdf, 182 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 005 ACR 191/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ESTATE OF RAYMOND MORRIS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: The appellant was self-represented when the appeal was lodged L...

3. KH v ED [2018] NZDT 1434 (20 September 2018) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Ground for Appeal There is only one ground for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. This is that the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceed...

4. [2012] NZEmpC 118 Hamon v Coromandel Independent Living Trust [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...2000 (the Act) and, therefore, it falls outside the statutory confidentiality granted by that section. Alternatively, it is contended that the alleged blackmail threat falls within the exception considered, but not determined, by the Court of Appeal in Just Hotel Ltd v Jesudhass. 1 In that case, after determining that there was no ambiguity in the words of s 148(1) of the Act and that all communications “for the purposes of the mediation” attract statutory confidentiality exce...

5. [2015] NZSSAA 039, 29 May [pdf, 44 KB]

   [2015] NZSSAA 039 Reference No. SSA 016/15 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member HEARING at AUCKLAND on 11 May 2015 APPEARANCES The appellant in person Ms P Siueva for the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development DECISION...

6. [2013] NZEmpC 94 Fifield v Rotorua City Council [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...challenging that second dismissal appear to have been brought in the Labour Court or, subsequently, in the Employment Tribunal established under the Employment Contracts Act 1991, as they could have been. [7] In 2007 Mr Fifield applied to the Court of Appeal for leave to have his grievance dealt with. Although the jurisdictional basis of his application to the Court of Appeal was far from clear, its judgment 3 records that it was treated as an

7. [2015] NZSSAA 006, 13 February [pdf, 39 KB]

   [2015] NZSSAA 06 Reference No. SSA 111/14 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXXagainst a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member HEARING by telephone conference call on 10 December 2014 APPEARANCES Ms T Corin for the appellant Mr G Moore for the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Developmen...

8. [2015] NZSSAA 60 (26 August 2015) [pdf, 31 KB]

   [2015] NZSSAA 060 Reference No. SSA 163/14 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member HEARING at WELLINGTON on 14 April 2015 APPEARANCES Mr G Howell – Advocate for the appellant Mr R Signal for the Chief Executive of...

9. Te Runanga o Ngati Hine v Te Runanga a Iwi o Ngapuhi Special Aid [2014] Māori Appellate Court MB 133 (2014 APPEAL 133) [pdf, 124 KB]

   2014 Maori Appellate Court MB 133 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20140006871 A20110012598 APPEAL 2011/22 UNDER Section 98 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An application by WAIHOROI SHORTLAND for TE RŪNANGA O NGĀTI HINE pursuant to section 98 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 for Special Aid in relation to proceedings before the Māori Appellate Court in the appeal of the determination of a dispute between TE...

10. Martelli v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 409) NZREADT 18 [pdf, 301 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 18 READT 038/17 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN ANITA MARTELLI Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 409) First Respondent AND ALENA PEACOCK Second Respondent (not participating) On the papers: Tribunal: Mr J Doogue, Deputy Chairperson Mr G Denley, Member Ms C Sandelin, Member...