14337 items matching your search terms
[2015] NZSSAA 062 Reference No. SSA 122/13 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member HEARING at WELLINGTON on 10 June 2015 APPEARANCES Mr C Griggs for the appellant Mr N Mumford for the Chief Executive of the Ministry of S...
[2016] NZSSAA 106 Reference No. SSA 033/16 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Auckland against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member HEARING at AUCKLAND on 14 November 2016 APPEARANCES The appellant in person Patira Suieva for Chief Execu...
...conclusions. [10] Put bluntly, counsel submitted that the applicant is seeking to set aside the Appellate Court decision by a side wind because they do not like it. They have made it plain that they do not agree with the decision. The trustees could have appealed or sought judicial review. They did not do so. Having failed to exercise its rights of appeal or review, the trust can hardly argue now that this Court should now act to set aside a superior court order. The application the...
...VB on behalf of Mr WR in September 2012 to provide an opinion on employment related matters and then acted for Mr WR as the matter progressed through mediation, the Employment Relations Authority, the Employment Court, and finally the Court of Appeal. [3] The Court of Appeal judgment was issued on [Date] and upheld the judgment of the Employment Court Judge who, in turn, had upheld the decision of the 2 Employment Relations Authority. The Employment Relations Authority had made...
...appellant. [9] The appellant sought a review of the decision to suspend his benefit. The matter was reviewed internally and by a Benefits Review Committee. The Benefits Review Committee upheld the decision of the Chief Executive. The appellant then appealed to this Authority. [10] In the course of preparing for the appeal, the Ministry conceded that it had overlooked the decision not to treat the failure to attend the appointment on 27 August as an obligation failure. A decision wa...
[2020] NZSSAA 20 Reference no: NZSSAA106/19 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 2018 AND IN THE MATTER of an Appeal to the Social Security Appeal Authority by XXXX of XXXX, against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee. BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY G Pearson (Chairperson) C Joe (Member) J Ryall (Member) Indicative Decision: Monday, 09 November 2020 Representation: The Appellant in person Mr Pieter Engels, a...
.................................................................................................................... 9 Publication of decisions .......................................................................................................... 10 Appeals .................................................................................................................................. 10 3 INTRODUCTION This Practice Note is issued pursuant to section 65(2)(b) of the Legal S...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 180 ACR 66/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN MARTIN COLDRICK Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: B Woodhouse for the Appellant B Marten for the Respondent Judgment: 20 September 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF J...
.................................................................................................................... 9 Publication of decisions .......................................................................................................... 10 Appeals .................................................................................................................................. 10 3 INTRODUCTION This Practice Note is issued pursuant to section 65(2)(b) of the Legal S...
...that in other contexts the booklets ordered by CU may not be a large order but the website statements set out what orders qualify for QD Ltd’s fast delivery service. 1 This three step approach was set out by Justice Tipping in the Court of Appeal decision AMP Finance NZ Ltd v Heaven (1997) 8 TCLR144 and has been regularly adopted in considering s 9, FTA. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 15. CU initially placed his order in the afternoon of 31 May 2021 and then re-submitted...